Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] MIPS: ralink: fix PCI IO resources

[Greg KH]

On Sun, Oct 03, 2021 at 06:21:21PM +0200, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 10:32 PM Sergio Paracuellos
> <sergio.paracuellos@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > MIPs ralink need a special tratement regarding the way it handles PCI IO
> > resources. On MIPS I/O ports are memory mapped, so we access them using normal
> > load/store instructions. MIPS 'plat_mem_setup()' function does a call to
> > 'set_io_port_base(KSEG1)'. There, variable 'mips_io_port_base'
> > is set then using this address which is a virtual address to which all
> > ports are being mapped. Ralink I/O space has a mapping of bus address
> > equal to the window into the mmio space, with an offset of IO start range
> > cpu address. This means that to have this working we need:
> > - linux port numbers in the range 0-0xffff.
> > - pci port numbers in the range 0-0xffff.
> > - io_offset being zero.
> >
> > These means at the end to have bus address 0 mapped to IO range cpu address.
> > We need a way of properly set 'mips_io_port_base' with a virtually mapped
> > value of the IO cpu address.
> >
> > This series do the following approach:
> > 1) Revert two bad commit from a previous attempt of make this work [0].
> > 2) Set PCI_IOBASE to mips 'mips_io_port_base'.
> > 3) Allow architecture dependent 'pci_remap_iospace'.
> > 4) Implement 'pci_remap_iospace' for MIPS.
> > 5) Be sure IOBASE address for IO window is set with correct value.
> >
> > More context about this series appoach in this mail thread [1].
> >
> > Patches related with reverts are from this merge cycle so they are only
> > added to the staging git tree. So to have all stuff together I'd like to
> > get everybody Ack's to get all of this series through staging tree if
> > possible :).
> >
> > Thanks in advance for your time.
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> >  - Collect Arnd's Acked-by for the patches.
> >  - Be sure IO resource start address is zero and WARN_ONCE if it is not
> >    on MIPS pci_remap_iospace() patch. Also make use of 'resource_size'
> >    instead of do the logic explicitly again.
> 
> I think nothing is missing to get this added through the staging tree.

Great, thanks for sticking with this, will go queue it up now.

greg k-h