Re: [PATCH] tty: serial: samsung: Improve naming for common macro

From: Sam Protsenko
Date: Tue Oct 05 2021 - 05:57:14 EST


On Wed, 15 Sept 2021 at 10:28, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 14/09/2021 16:23, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> > Having "_USI" suffix in EXYNOS_COMMON_SERIAL_DRV_DATA_USI() macro is
> > confusing. Rename it to just EXYNOS_COMMON_SERIAL_DRV_DATA() and provide
> > USI registers availability for all Exynos variants instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c | 11 ++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)>
> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c
> > index e2f49863e9c2..542b7e2b99dc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c
> > @@ -2780,7 +2780,7 @@ static struct s3c24xx_serial_drv_data s5pv210_serial_drv_data = {
> > #endif
> >
> > #if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS)
> > -#define EXYNOS_COMMON_SERIAL_DRV_DATA_USI(_has_usi) \
> > +#define EXYNOS_COMMON_SERIAL_DRV_DATA(_has_usi) \
> > .info = &(struct s3c24xx_uart_info) { \
> > .name = "Samsung Exynos UART", \
> > .type = TYPE_S3C6400, \
> > @@ -2804,21 +2804,18 @@ static struct s3c24xx_serial_drv_data s5pv210_serial_drv_data = {
> > .has_fracval = 1, \
> > } \
> >
> > -#define EXYNOS_COMMON_SERIAL_DRV_DATA \
> > - EXYNOS_COMMON_SERIAL_DRV_DATA_USI(0)
> > -
> > static struct s3c24xx_serial_drv_data exynos4210_serial_drv_data = {
> > - EXYNOS_COMMON_SERIAL_DRV_DATA,
> > + EXYNOS_COMMON_SERIAL_DRV_DATA(0),
> > .fifosize = { 256, 64, 16, 16 },
> > };
> >
> > static struct s3c24xx_serial_drv_data exynos5433_serial_drv_data = {
> > - EXYNOS_COMMON_SERIAL_DRV_DATA,
> > + EXYNOS_COMMON_SERIAL_DRV_DATA(0),
> > .fifosize = { 64, 256, 16, 256 },
> > };
> >
> > static struct s3c24xx_serial_drv_data exynos850_serial_drv_data = {
> > - EXYNOS_COMMON_SERIAL_DRV_DATA_USI(1),
>
> Makes sense, although I would prefer to have here true or false. More
> obvious. Otherwise "1" looks like counter/number for some property.
>
> The has_usi field in struct could be then also converted to bool.
>

No problem, will send v2 shortly.

>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof