Re: [PATCH net v9] skb_expand_head() adjust skb->truesize incorrectly

From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Mon Oct 04 2021 - 15:26:09 EST




On 10/4/21 6:00 AM, Vasily Averin wrote:
> Christoph Paasch reports [1] about incorrect skb->truesize
> after skb_expand_head() call in ip6_xmit.
> This may happen because of two reasons:
> - skb_set_owner_w() for newly cloned skb is called too early,
> before pskb_expand_head() where truesize is adjusted for (!skb-sk) case.
> - pskb_expand_head() does not adjust truesize in (skb->sk) case.
> In this case sk->sk_wmem_alloc should be adjusted too.
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/8/20/1082
>
> Fixes: f1260ff15a71 ("skbuff: introduce skb_expand_head()")
> Fixes: 2d85a1b31dde ("ipv6: ip6_finish_output2: set sk into newly allocated nskb")
> Reported-by: Christoph Paasch <christoph.paasch@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v9: restored sock_edemux check
> v8: clone non-wmem skb
> v7 (from kuba@):
> shift more magic into helpers,
> follow Eric's advice and don't inherit non-wmem skbs for now
> v6: fixed delta,
> improved comments
> v5: fixed else condition, thanks to Eric
> reworked update of expanded skb,
> added corresponding comments
> v4: decided to use is_skb_wmem() after pskb_expand_head() call
> fixed 'return (EXPRESSION);' in os_skb_wmem according to Eric Dumazet
> v3: removed __pskb_expand_head(),
> added is_skb_wmem() helper for skb with wmem-compatible destructors
> there are 2 ways to use it:
> - before pskb_expand_head(), to create skb clones
> - after successfull pskb_expand_head() to change owner on extended
> skb.
> v2: based on patch version from Eric Dumazet,
> added __pskb_expand_head() function, which can be forced
> to adjust skb->truesize and sk->sk_wmem_alloc.
> ---
> include/net/sock.h | 1 +
> net/core/skbuff.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> net/core/sock.c | 8 ++++++++
> 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
> index 66a9a90f9558..a547651d46a7 100644
> --- a/include/net/sock.h
> +++ b/include/net/sock.h
> @@ -1695,6 +1695,7 @@ struct sk_buff *sock_wmalloc(struct sock *sk, unsigned long size, int force,
> gfp_t priority);
> void __sock_wfree(struct sk_buff *skb);
> void sock_wfree(struct sk_buff *skb);
> +bool is_skb_wmem(const struct sk_buff *skb);
> struct sk_buff *sock_omalloc(struct sock *sk, unsigned long size,
> gfp_t priority);
> void skb_orphan_partial(struct sk_buff *skb);
> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> index 2170bea2c7de..8cb6d360cda5 100644
> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> @@ -1804,30 +1804,39 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(skb_realloc_headroom);
> struct sk_buff *skb_expand_head(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int headroom)
> {
> int delta = headroom - skb_headroom(skb);
> + int osize = skb_end_offset(skb);
> + struct sock *sk = skb->sk;
>
> if (WARN_ONCE(delta <= 0,
> "%s is expecting an increase in the headroom", __func__))
> return skb;
>
> - /* pskb_expand_head() might crash, if skb is shared */
> - if (skb_shared(skb)) {
> + delta = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(delta);
> + /* pskb_expand_head() might crash, if skb is shared. */
> + if (skb_shared(skb) || !is_skb_wmem(skb)) {
> struct sk_buff *nskb = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
>
> - if (likely(nskb)) {
> - if (skb->sk)
> - skb_set_owner_w(nskb, skb->sk);
> - consume_skb(skb);
> - } else {
> - kfree_skb(skb);
> - }
> + if (unlikely(!nskb))
> + goto fail;
> +
> + if (sk)
> + skb_set_owner_w(nskb, sk);
> + consume_skb(skb);
> skb = nskb;
> }
> - if (skb &&
> - pskb_expand_head(skb, SKB_DATA_ALIGN(delta), 0, GFP_ATOMIC)) {
> - kfree_skb(skb);
> - skb = NULL;
> + if (pskb_expand_head(skb, delta, 0, GFP_ATOMIC))
> + goto fail;
> +
> + if (sk && skb->destructor != sock_edemux) {

Why not re-using is_skb_wmem() here ?
Testing != sock_edemux looks strange.
> + delta = skb_end_offset(skb) - osize;
> + refcount_add(delta, &sk->sk_wmem_alloc);
> + skb->truesize += delta;
> }
> return skb;
> +
> +fail:
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> + return NULL;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(skb_expand_head);
>
> diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> index 62627e868e03..1932755ae9ba 100644
> --- a/net/core/sock.c
> +++ b/net/core/sock.c
> @@ -2227,6 +2227,14 @@ void skb_set_owner_w(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(skb_set_owner_w);
>
> +bool is_skb_wmem(const struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + return skb->destructor == sock_wfree ||
> + skb->destructor == __sock_wfree ||
> + (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET) && skb->destructor == tcp_wfree);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(is_skb_wmem);
> +

This probably should be inlined.

> static bool can_skb_orphan_partial(const struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_TLS_DEVICE
>