Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Use direction definition DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL instead of PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL

From: Daniel Vetter
Date: Fri Oct 01 2021 - 10:50:25 EST

Next message: Jason Gunthorpe: "Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] habanalabs: add support for dma-buf exporter"
Previous message: Jason Gunthorpe: "Re: [PATCH] IB/mlx5: unify return value to ENOENT"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 08:58:15PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 30/09/2021 à 16:21, Daniel Vetter a écrit :
> > On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 08:46:12PM +0800, Cai Huoqing wrote:
> > > Replace direction definition PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL
> > > with DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL, because it helps to enhance readability
> > > and avoid possible inconsistency.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Cai Huoqing <caihuoqing@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Applied to drm-intel-gt-next, thanks for the patch.
> > -Daniel
>
> Hi,
> just in case, a similar patch received some (unrelated) comments a few weeks
> ago. See [1].
>
> Should it rings some bells to someone who know who knows what should be
> done.
>
> Just my 2c.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/kernel-janitors/0cd61d5b-ac88-31e8-99ad-143af480416f@xxxxxxx/

Hm yeah there's some fishy stuff in here, but it's cc'ed to intel-gfx so
should get picked up there.
-Daniel

>
> CJ
>
>
> >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_region_lmem.c | 4 ++--
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c | 17 ++++++++---------
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c | 4 ++--
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 4 ++--
> > > 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_region_lmem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_region_lmem.c
> > > index a74b72f50cc9..afb35d2e5c73 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_region_lmem.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_region_lmem.c
> > > @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static int init_fake_lmem_bar(struct intel_memory_region *mem)
> > > mem->remap_addr = dma_map_resource(i915->drm.dev,
> > > mem->region.start,
> > > mem->fake_mappable.size,
> > > - PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL,
> > > + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL,
> > > DMA_ATTR_FORCE_CONTIGUOUS);
> > > if (dma_mapping_error(i915->drm.dev, mem->remap_addr)) {
> > > drm_mm_remove_node(&mem->fake_mappable);
> > > @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ static void release_fake_lmem_bar(struct intel_memory_region *mem)
> > > dma_unmap_resource(mem->i915->drm.dev,
> > > mem->remap_addr,
> > > mem->fake_mappable.size,
> > > - PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL,
> > > + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL,
> > > DMA_ATTR_FORCE_CONTIGUOUS);
> > > }
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c
> > > index e5c2fdfc20e3..53d0cb327539 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c
> > > @@ -745,7 +745,7 @@ static void ppgtt_free_spt(struct intel_vgpu_ppgtt_spt *spt)
> > > trace_spt_free(spt->vgpu->id, spt, spt->guest_page.type);
> > > dma_unmap_page(kdev, spt->shadow_page.mfn << I915_GTT_PAGE_SHIFT, 4096,
> > > - PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> > > + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> > > radix_tree_delete(&spt->vgpu->gtt.spt_tree, spt->shadow_page.mfn);
> > > @@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ static struct intel_vgpu_ppgtt_spt *ppgtt_alloc_spt(
> > > */
> > > spt->shadow_page.type = type;
> > > daddr = dma_map_page(kdev, spt->shadow_page.page,
> > > - 0, 4096, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> > > + 0, 4096, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> > > if (dma_mapping_error(kdev, daddr)) {
> > > gvt_vgpu_err("fail to map dma addr\n");
> > > ret = -EINVAL;
> > > @@ -865,7 +865,7 @@ static struct intel_vgpu_ppgtt_spt *ppgtt_alloc_spt(
> > > return spt;
> > > err_unmap_dma:
> > > - dma_unmap_page(kdev, daddr, PAGE_SIZE, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> > > + dma_unmap_page(kdev, daddr, PAGE_SIZE, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> > > err_free_spt:
> > > free_spt(spt);
> > > return ERR_PTR(ret);
> > > @@ -2409,8 +2409,7 @@ static int alloc_scratch_pages(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu,
> > > return -ENOMEM;
> > > }
> > > - daddr = dma_map_page(dev, virt_to_page(scratch_pt), 0,
> > > - 4096, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> > > + daddr = dma_map_page(dev, virt_to_page(scratch_pt), 0, 4096, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> > > if (dma_mapping_error(dev, daddr)) {
> > > gvt_vgpu_err("fail to dmamap scratch_pt\n");
> > > __free_page(virt_to_page(scratch_pt));
> > > @@ -2461,7 +2460,7 @@ static int release_scratch_page_tree(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
> > > if (vgpu->gtt.scratch_pt[i].page != NULL) {
> > > daddr = (dma_addr_t)(vgpu->gtt.scratch_pt[i].page_mfn <<
> > > I915_GTT_PAGE_SHIFT);
> > > - dma_unmap_page(dev, daddr, 4096, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> > > + dma_unmap_page(dev, daddr, 4096, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> > > __free_page(vgpu->gtt.scratch_pt[i].page);
> > > vgpu->gtt.scratch_pt[i].page = NULL;
> > > vgpu->gtt.scratch_pt[i].page_mfn = 0;
> > > @@ -2741,7 +2740,7 @@ int intel_gvt_init_gtt(struct intel_gvt *gvt)
> > > }
> > > daddr = dma_map_page(dev, virt_to_page(page), 0,
> > > - 4096, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> > > + 4096, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> > > if (dma_mapping_error(dev, daddr)) {
> > > gvt_err("fail to dmamap scratch ggtt page\n");
> > > __free_page(virt_to_page(page));
> > > @@ -2755,7 +2754,7 @@ int intel_gvt_init_gtt(struct intel_gvt *gvt)
> > > ret = setup_spt_oos(gvt);
> > > if (ret) {
> > > gvt_err("fail to initialize SPT oos\n");
> > > - dma_unmap_page(dev, daddr, 4096, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> > > + dma_unmap_page(dev, daddr, 4096, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> > > __free_page(gvt->gtt.scratch_page);
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > > @@ -2779,7 +2778,7 @@ void intel_gvt_clean_gtt(struct intel_gvt *gvt)
> > > dma_addr_t daddr = (dma_addr_t)(gvt->gtt.scratch_mfn <<
> > > I915_GTT_PAGE_SHIFT);
> > > - dma_unmap_page(dev, daddr, 4096, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> > > + dma_unmap_page(dev, daddr, 4096, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> > > __free_page(gvt->gtt.scratch_page);
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> > > index 7efa386449d1..20b82fb036f8 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> > > @@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ static int gvt_dma_map_page(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu, unsigned long gfn,
> > > return ret;
> > > /* Setup DMA mapping. */
> > > - *dma_addr = dma_map_page(dev, page, 0, size, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> > > + *dma_addr = dma_map_page(dev, page, 0, size, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> > > if (dma_mapping_error(dev, *dma_addr)) {
> > > gvt_vgpu_err("DMA mapping failed for pfn 0x%lx, ret %d\n",
> > > page_to_pfn(page), ret);
> > > @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ static void gvt_dma_unmap_page(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu, unsigned long gfn,
> > > {
> > > struct device *dev = vgpu->gvt->gt->i915->drm.dev;
> > > - dma_unmap_page(dev, dma_addr, size, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> > > + dma_unmap_page(dev, dma_addr, size, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> > > gvt_unpin_guest_page(vgpu, gfn, size);
> > > }
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> > > index 36489be4896b..cd5f2348a187 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> > > @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ int i915_gem_gtt_prepare_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> > > do {
> > > if (dma_map_sg_attrs(obj->base.dev->dev,
> > > pages->sgl, pages->nents,
> > > - PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL,
> > > + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL,
> > > DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC |
> > > DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING |
> > > DMA_ATTR_NO_WARN))
> > > @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ void i915_gem_gtt_finish_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> > > usleep_range(100, 250);
> > > dma_unmap_sg(i915->drm.dev, pages->sgl, pages->nents,
> > > - PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> > > + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> > > }
> > > /**
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1
> > >
> >
>

--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

Next message: Jason Gunthorpe: "Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] habanalabs: add support for dma-buf exporter"
Previous message: Jason Gunthorpe: "Re: [PATCH] IB/mlx5: unify return value to ENOENT"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]