Re: [PATCH v2] lockdep: Let lock_is_held_type() detect recursive read as read

From: Boqun Feng
Date: Tue Sep 07 2021 - 22:17:52 EST


On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 10:40:01AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> lock_is_held_type(, 1) detects acquired read locks. It only recognized
> locks acquired with lock_acquire_shared(). Read locks acquired with
> lock_acquire_shared_recursive() are not recognized because a `2' is
> stored as the read value.
>
> Rework the check to additionally recognise lock's read value one and two
> as a read held lock.
>
> Fixes: e918188611f07 ("locking: More accurate annotations for read_lock()")
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v1…v2:
> - simplify the read check to !!read as suggested by Waiman Long.
>
> kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> @@ -5366,7 +5366,7 @@ int __lock_is_held(const struct lockdep_
> struct held_lock *hlock = curr->held_locks + i;
>
> if (match_held_lock(hlock, lock)) {
> - if (read == -1 || hlock->read == read)
> + if (read == -1 || hlock->read == !!read)

I think this should be:

!!hlock->read == read

With that,

Acked-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>

Regards,
Boqun

> return LOCK_STATE_HELD;
>
> return LOCK_STATE_NOT_HELD;