Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: switch from 'pci_' to 'dma_' API

From: Christian König
Date: Mon Aug 23 2021 - 02:17:44 EST


Am 22.08.21 um 23:23 schrieb Christophe JAILLET:
The wrappers in include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h should go away.

The patch has been generated with the coccinelle script below.

It has been compile tested.

@@
@@
- PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL
+ DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL

@@
@@
- PCI_DMA_TODEVICE
+ DMA_TO_DEVICE

@@
@@
- PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE
+ DMA_FROM_DEVICE

@@
@@
- PCI_DMA_NONE
+ DMA_NONE

@@
expression e1, e2, e3;
@@
- pci_alloc_consistent(e1, e2, e3)
+ dma_alloc_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, GFP_)

@@
expression e1, e2, e3;
@@
- pci_zalloc_consistent(e1, e2, e3)
+ dma_alloc_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, GFP_)

@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
- pci_free_consistent(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+ dma_free_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)

@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
- pci_map_single(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+ dma_map_single(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)

@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
- pci_unmap_single(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+ dma_unmap_single(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)

@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4, e5;
@@
- pci_map_page(e1, e2, e3, e4, e5)
+ dma_map_page(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4, e5)

@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
- pci_unmap_page(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+ dma_unmap_page(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)

@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
- pci_map_sg(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+ dma_map_sg(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)

@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
- pci_unmap_sg(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+ dma_unmap_sg(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)

@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
- pci_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+ dma_sync_single_for_cpu(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)

@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
- pci_dma_sync_single_for_device(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+ dma_sync_single_for_device(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)

@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
- pci_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+ dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)

@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
- pci_dma_sync_sg_for_device(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+ dma_sync_sg_for_device(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)

@@
expression e1, e2;
@@
- pci_dma_mapping_error(e1, e2)
+ dma_mapping_error(&e1->dev, e2)

@@
expression e1, e2;
@@
- pci_set_dma_mask(e1, e2)
+ dma_set_mask(&e1->dev, e2)

@@
expression e1, e2;
@@
- pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(e1, e2)
+ dma_set_coherent_mask(&e1->dev, e2)

Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>

Should we pick them up or do you want to push them upstream?

Regards,
Christian.

---
If needed, see post from Christoph Hellwig on the kernel-janitors ML:
https://marc.info/?l=kernel-janitors&m=158745678307186&w=4
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c
index ac8c3251b616..4f0fbf667431 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c
@@ -785,7 +785,7 @@ int radeon_dummy_page_init(struct radeon_device *rdev)
if (rdev->dummy_page.page == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
rdev->dummy_page.addr = dma_map_page(&rdev->pdev->dev, rdev->dummy_page.page,
- 0, PAGE_SIZE, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
+ 0, PAGE_SIZE, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
if (dma_mapping_error(&rdev->pdev->dev, rdev->dummy_page.addr)) {
dev_err(&rdev->pdev->dev, "Failed to DMA MAP the dummy page\n");
__free_page(rdev->dummy_page.page);
@@ -808,8 +808,8 @@ void radeon_dummy_page_fini(struct radeon_device *rdev)
{
if (rdev->dummy_page.page == NULL)
return;
- pci_unmap_page(rdev->pdev, rdev->dummy_page.addr,
- PAGE_SIZE, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
+ dma_unmap_page(&rdev->pdev->dev, rdev->dummy_page.addr, PAGE_SIZE,
+ DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
__free_page(rdev->dummy_page.page);
rdev->dummy_page.page = NULL;
}