Re: [PATCH V3 13/13] HV/Storvsc: Add Isolation VM support for storvsc driver

[hch@xxxxxx]

On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 06:17:40PM +0000, Michael Kelley wrote:
> > +#define storvsc_dma_map(dev, page, offset, size, dir) \
> > +	dma_map_page(dev, page, offset, size, dir)
> > +
> > +#define storvsc_dma_unmap(dev, dma_range, dir)		\
> > +		dma_unmap_page(dev, dma_range.dma,	\
> > +			       dma_range.mapping_size,	\
> > +			       dir ? DMA_FROM_DEVICE : DMA_TO_DEVICE)
> > +
> 
> Each of these macros is used only once.  IMHO, they don't
> add a lot of value.  Just coding dma_map/unmap_page()
> inline would be fine and eliminate these lines of code.

Yes, I had the same thought when looking over the code.  Especially
as macros tend to further obsfucate the code (compared to actual helper
functions).

> > +				for (i = 0; i < request->hvpg_count; i++)
> > +					storvsc_dma_unmap(&device->device,
> > +						request->dma_range[i],
> > +						request->vstor_packet.vm_srb.data_in == READ_TYPE);
> 
> I think you can directly get the DMA direction as request->cmd->sc_data_direction.

Yes.

> > 
> > @@ -1824,6 +1848,13 @@ static int storvsc_queuecommand(struct Scsi_Host *host, struct scsi_cmnd *scmnd)
> >  		payload->range.len = length;
> >  		payload->range.offset = offset_in_hvpg;
> > 
> > +		cmd_request->dma_range = kcalloc(hvpg_count,
> > +				 sizeof(*cmd_request->dma_range),
> > +				 GFP_ATOMIC);
> 
> With this patch, it appears that storvsc_queuecommand() is always
> doing bounce buffering, even when running in a non-isolated VM.
> The dma_range is always allocated, and the inner loop below does
> the dma mapping for every I/O page.  The corresponding code in
> storvsc_on_channel_callback() that does the dma unmap allows for
> the dma_range to be NULL, but that never happens.

Maybe I'm missing something in the hyperv code, but I don't think
dma_map_page would bounce buffer for the non-isolated case.  It
will just return the physical address.

> > +		if (!cmd_request->dma_range) {
> > +			ret = -ENOMEM;
> 
> The other memory allocation failure in this function returns
> SCSI_MLQUEUE_DEVICE_BUSY.   It may be debatable as to whether
> that's the best approach, but that's a topic for a different patch.  I
> would suggest being consistent and using the same return code
> here.

Independent of if SCSI_MLQUEUE_DEVICE_BUSY is good (it it a common
pattern in SCSI drivers), ->queuecommand can't return normal
negative errnos.  It must return the SCSI_MLQUEUE_* codes or 0.
We should probably change the return type of the method definition
to a suitable enum to make this more clear.

> > +				if (offset_in_hvpg) {
> > +					payload->range.offset = dma & ~HV_HYP_PAGE_MASK;
> > +					offset_in_hvpg = 0;
> > +				}
> 
> I'm not clear on why payload->range.offset needs to be set again.
> Even after the dma mapping is done, doesn't the offset in the first
> page have to be the same?  If it wasn't the same, Hyper-V wouldn't
> be able to process the PFN list correctly.  In fact, couldn't the above
> code just always set offset_in_hvpg = 0?

Careful.  DMA mapping is supposed to keep the offset in the page, but
for that the DMA mapping code needs to know what the device considers a
"page".  For that the driver needs to set the min_align_mask field in
struct device_dma_parameters.

> 
> The whole approach here is to do dma remapping on each individual page
> of the I/O buffer.  But wouldn't it be possible to use dma_map_sg() to map
> each scatterlist entry as a unit?  Each scatterlist entry describes a range of
> physically contiguous memory.  After dma_map_sg(), the resulting dma
> address must also refer to a physically contiguous range in the swiotlb
> bounce buffer memory.   So at the top of the "for" loop over the scatterlist
> entries, do dma_map_sg() if we're in an isolated VM.  Then compute the
> hvpfn value based on the dma address instead of sg_page().  But everything
> else is the same, and the inner loop for populating the pfn_arry is unmodified.
> Furthermore, the dma_range array that you've added is not needed, since
> scatterlist entries already have a dma_address field for saving the mapped
> address, and dma_unmap_sg() uses that field.

Yes, I think dma_map_sg is the right thing to use here, probably even
for the non-isolated case so that we can get the hv drivers out of their
little corner and into being more like a normal kernel driver.  That
is, use the scsi_dma_map/scsi_dma_unmap helpers, and then iterate over
the dma addresses one page at a time using for_each_sg_dma_page.

> 
> One thing:  There's a maximum swiotlb mapping size, which I think works
> out to be 256 Kbytes.  See swiotlb_max_mapping_size().  We need to make
> sure that we don't get a scatterlist entry bigger than this size.  But I think
> this already happens because you set the device->dma_mask field in
> Patch 11 of this series.  __scsi_init_queue checks for this setting and
> sets max_sectors to limits transfers to the max mapping size.

Indeed.