Re: [PATCH] f2fs: change value of recovery to bool

From: Jaegeuk Kim
Date: Mon Aug 16 2021 - 20:30:38 EST


Hmm, I don't see a great benefit of this patch. Do we have a chance to use
integer to get more specifics of the recovery reason in future?

On 08/16, Yangtao Li wrote:
> Recovery has only two values, 0 and 1, let's change it to bool type.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/super.c | 11 ++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> index 8fecd3050ccd..98727e04d271 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> @@ -3541,7 +3541,7 @@ static int init_blkz_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int devi)
> */
> static int read_raw_super_block(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> struct f2fs_super_block **raw_super,
> - int *valid_super_block, int *recovery)
> + int *valid_super_block, bool *recovery)
> {
> struct super_block *sb = sbi->sb;
> int block;
> @@ -3559,7 +3559,7 @@ static int read_raw_super_block(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> f2fs_err(sbi, "Unable to read %dth superblock",
> block + 1);
> err = -EIO;
> - *recovery = 1;
> + *recovery = true;
> continue;
> }
>
> @@ -3569,7 +3569,7 @@ static int read_raw_super_block(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> f2fs_err(sbi, "Can't find valid F2FS filesystem in %dth superblock",
> block + 1);
> brelse(bh);
> - *recovery = 1;
> + *recovery = true;
> continue;
> }
>
> @@ -3784,15 +3784,16 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
> int err;
> bool skip_recovery = false, need_fsck = false;
> char *options = NULL;
> - int recovery, i, valid_super_block;
> + int i, valid_super_block;
> struct curseg_info *seg_i;
> int retry_cnt = 1;
> + bool recovery;
>
> try_onemore:
> err = -EINVAL;
> raw_super = NULL;
> valid_super_block = -1;
> - recovery = 0;
> + recovery = false;
>
> /* allocate memory for f2fs-specific super block info */
> sbi = kzalloc(sizeof(struct f2fs_sb_info), GFP_KERNEL);
> --
> 2.32.0