[PATCH v1 2/6] gpio: mlxbf2: Drop wrong use of ACPI_PTR()

[Andy Shevchenko]

ACPI_PTR() is more harmful than helpful. For example, in this case
if CONFIG_ACPI=n, the ID table left unused which is not what we want.

Instead of adding ifdeffery here and there, drop ACPI_PTR() and
replace acpi.h with mod_devicetable.h.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf2.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf2.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf2.c
index 68c471c10fa4..c0aa622fef76 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf2.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf2.c
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 
-#include <linux/acpi.h>
 #include <linux/bitfield.h>
 #include <linux/bitops.h>
 #include <linux/device.h>
@@ -8,6 +7,7 @@
 #include <linux/io.h>
 #include <linux/ioport.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <linux/pm.h>
@@ -307,14 +307,14 @@ static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(mlxbf2_pm_ops, mlxbf2_gpio_suspend, mlxbf2_gpio_resume)
 
 static const struct acpi_device_id __maybe_unused mlxbf2_gpio_acpi_match[] = {
 	{ "MLNXBF22", 0 },
-	{},
+	{}
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, mlxbf2_gpio_acpi_match);
 
 static struct platform_driver mlxbf2_gpio_driver = {
 	.driver = {
 		.name = "mlxbf2_gpio",
-		.acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(mlxbf2_gpio_acpi_match),
+		.acpi_match_table = mlxbf2_gpio_acpi_match,
 		.pm = &mlxbf2_pm_ops,
 	},
 	.probe    = mlxbf2_gpio_probe,
-- 
2.30.2