Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] powerpc: Optimize register usage for esr register

From: Michael Ellerman
Date: Fri Aug 06 2021 - 02:53:24 EST


sxwjean@xxxxxx writes:
> From: Xiongwei Song <sxwjean@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Create an anonymous union for dsisr and esr regsiters, we can reference
> esr to get the exception detail when CONFIG_4xx=y or CONFIG_BOOKE=y.
> Otherwise, reference dsisr. This makes code more clear.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiongwei Song <sxwjean@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/ptrace.h | 5 ++++-
> arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h | 5 ++++-
> arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 2 +-
> arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace.c | 2 ++
> arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c | 2 +-
> arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/machine_check.c | 4 ++--
> arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/machine_check.c | 2 +-
> 8 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ptrace.h
> index 3e5d470a6155..c252d04b1206 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ptrace.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ptrace.h
> @@ -44,7 +44,10 @@ struct pt_regs
> #endif
> unsigned long trap;
> unsigned long dar;
> - unsigned long dsisr;
> + union {
> + unsigned long dsisr;
> + unsigned long esr;
> + };

I don't mind doing that.

> unsigned long result;
> };
> };
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h
> index 7004cfea3f5f..e357288b5f34 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h
> @@ -53,7 +53,10 @@ struct pt_regs
> /* N.B. for critical exceptions on 4xx, the dar and dsisr
> fields are overloaded to hold srr0 and srr1. */
> unsigned long dar; /* Fault registers */
> - unsigned long dsisr; /* on 4xx/Book-E used for ESR */
> + union {
> + unsigned long dsisr; /* on Book-S used for DSISR */
> + unsigned long esr; /* on 4xx/Book-E used for ESR */
> + };
> unsigned long result; /* Result of a system call */
> };

But I'm not sure about the use of anonymous unions in UAPI headers. Old
compilers don't support them, so there's a risk of breakage.

I'd rather we didn't touch the uapi version.


> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> index 185beb290580..f74af8f9133c 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> @@ -1499,7 +1499,7 @@ static void __show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
> trap == INTERRUPT_DATA_STORAGE ||
> trap == INTERRUPT_ALIGNMENT) {
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_4xx) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BOOKE))
> - pr_cont("DEAR: "REG" ESR: "REG" ", regs->dar, regs->dsisr);
> + pr_cont("DEAR: "REG" ESR: "REG" ", regs->dar, regs->esr);
> else
> pr_cont("DAR: "REG" DSISR: %08lx ", regs->dar, regs->dsisr);
> }
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace.c
> index 0a0a33eb0d28..00789ad2c4a3 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace.c
> @@ -375,6 +375,8 @@ void __init pt_regs_check(void)
> offsetof(struct user_pt_regs, dar));
> BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct pt_regs, dsisr) !=
> offsetof(struct user_pt_regs, dsisr));
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct pt_regs, esr) !=
> + offsetof(struct user_pt_regs, esr));
> BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct pt_regs, result) !=
> offsetof(struct user_pt_regs, result));
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
> index dfbce527c98e..2164f5705a0b 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -562,7 +562,7 @@ static inline int check_io_access(struct pt_regs *regs)
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_ADV_DEBUG_REGS
> /* On 4xx, the reason for the machine check or program exception
> is in the ESR. */
> -#define get_reason(regs) ((regs)->dsisr)
> +#define get_reason(regs) ((regs)->esr)
> #define REASON_FP ESR_FP
> #define REASON_ILLEGAL (ESR_PIL | ESR_PUO)
> #define REASON_PRIVILEGED ESR_PPR
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
> index a8d0ce85d39a..62953d4e7c93 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
> @@ -541,7 +541,11 @@ static __always_inline void __do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> long err;
>
> - err = ___do_page_fault(regs, regs->dar, regs->dsisr);
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_4xx) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BOOKE))
> + err = ___do_page_fault(regs, regs->dar, regs->esr);
> + else
> + err = ___do_page_fault(regs, regs->dar, regs->dsisr);

As Christophe said, I don't thinks this is an improvement.

It makes the code less readable. If anyone is confused about what is
passed to ___do_page_fault() they can either read the comment above it,
or look at the definition of pt_regs to see that esr and dsisr share
storage.

cheers