Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] TQMx86: TQMx110EB and TQMxE40x MFD/GPIO support

[Lee Jones]

On Fri, 16 Jul 2021, Matthias Schiffer wrote:

> On Fri, 2021-07-16 at 10:20 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, 02 Jul 2021, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
> > 
> > > Updated patch series:
> > > 
> > > - A number of new patches (more hardware support and a few fixes)
> > > - Patches 1-3 have gained Fixes tags
> > > - Patch 2 depends on 1, so maybe we can push the GPIO patch through the
> > >   MFD tree to keep them together?
> > > - The change in patch 7 was somewhat controversial. I've added a
> > >   warning, but it is the last patch of the series, so it doesn't affect
> > >   the rest of the series if it is rejected.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Matthias Schiffer (7):
> > >   gpio: tqmx86: really make IRQ optional
> > >   mfd: tqmx86: clear GPIO IRQ resource when no IRQ is set
> > >   mfd: tqmx86: remove incorrect TQMx90UC board ID
> > >   mfd: tqmx86: fix typo in "platform"
> > >   mfd: tqmx86: add support for TQMx110EB and TQMxE40x
> > >   mfd: tqmx86: add support for TQ-Systems DMI IDs
> > >   mfd: tqmx86: assume 24MHz LPC clock for unknown boards
> > > 
> > >  drivers/gpio/gpio-tqmx86.c |  6 ++---
> > >  drivers/mfd/tqmx86.c       | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > >  2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Patches look good.
> > 
> > Could you please collect up Andrew's acks, remove the suggested Fixes:
> > lines and resubmit please?
> 
> Are you referring to the Fixes: line in "[PATCH v2 3/7] mfd: tqmx86:
> remove incorrect TQMx90UC board ID"?

I'm referring to the lines that Andrew said did not qualify.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog