Re: [patch V3 00/66] x86/fpu: Spring cleaning and PKRU sanitizing

[Bae, Chang Seok]

On Jun 22, 2021, at 13:02, Bae, Chang Seok <chang.seok.bae@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Jun 21, 2021, at 15:22, Bae, Chang Seok <chang.seok.bae@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I tried to apply AMX patches on top of this. The test looks to be okay by far.
>> I will also give an update here if I find anything.
> 
> This looks to be vague about the test. I took cases shown in AMX v5 like this:
> 	https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210523193259.26200-24-chang.seok.bae@xxxxxxxxx/
> It validates AMX state with context switches, signal delivery/return, and
> context injection via ptrace.

Also, just for the record, as the next AMX version is imminent:

Lots of AMX-related code are mostly function name changes and I had to
readjust my assumption. (Maybe this is not conclusive yet as still digesting
the code.) But I think the rebase went well with the test results, and this
change improves the mainline in many ways that affect adjusting AMX code in
the right way.

Thanks,
Chang