Re: [PATCH] opp: of: Allow lazy-linking of required-opps to non genpd

From: Chanwoo Choi
Date: Wed Jun 16 2021 - 04:28:22 EST


On 6/16/21 4:55 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 16-06-21, 13:33, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
>> Don't limit required_opp_table to genpd only. One possible use case is
>> cpufreq based devfreq governor, which can use required-opps property to
>> derive devfreq from cpufreq.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> This is tested with the non genpd case mt8183-cci with passive
>> governor[1].
>> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/1616499241-4906-2-git-send-email-andrew-sh.cheng@xxxxxxxxxxxx/
>> ---
>> drivers/opp/of.c | 20 +-------------------
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/opp/of.c b/drivers/opp/of.c
>> index aa75a1caf08a3..9573facce53a5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/opp/of.c
>> +++ b/drivers/opp/of.c
>> @@ -201,17 +201,6 @@ static void _opp_table_alloc_required_tables(struct opp_table *opp_table,
>> lazy = true;
>> continue;
>> }
>> -
>> - /*
>> - * We only support genpd's OPPs in the "required-opps" for now,
>> - * as we don't know how much about other cases. Error out if the
>> - * required OPP doesn't belong to a genpd.
>> - */
>> - if (!required_opp_tables[i]->is_genpd) {
>> - dev_err(dev, "required-opp doesn't belong to genpd: %pOF\n",
>> - required_np);
>> - goto free_required_tables;
>> - }
>> }
>>
>> /* Let's do the linking later on */
>> @@ -379,13 +368,6 @@ static void lazy_link_required_opp_table(struct opp_table *new_table)
>> struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
>> int i, ret;
>>
>> - /*
>> - * We only support genpd's OPPs in the "required-opps" for now,
>> - * as we don't know much about other cases.
>> - */
>> - if (!new_table->is_genpd)
>> - return;
>> -
>> mutex_lock(&opp_table_lock);
>>
>> list_for_each_entry_safe(opp_table, temp, &lazy_opp_tables, lazy) {
>> @@ -873,7 +855,7 @@ static struct dev_pm_opp *_opp_add_static_v2(struct opp_table *opp_table,
>> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>
>> ret = _read_opp_key(new_opp, opp_table, np, &rate_not_available);
>> - if (ret < 0 && !opp_table->is_genpd) {
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> dev_err(dev, "%s: opp key field not found\n", __func__);
>> goto free_opp;
>> }
>
> Plus this and few changes to commit log.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/opp/core.c b/drivers/opp/core.c
> index e366218d6736..b335c077f215 100644
> --- a/drivers/opp/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/opp/core.c
> @@ -893,6 +893,16 @@ static int _set_required_opps(struct device *dev,
> if (!required_opp_tables)
> return 0;
>
> + /*
> + * We only support genpd's OPPs in the "required-opps" for now, as we
> + * don't know much about other use cases. Error out if the required OPP
> + * doesn't belong to a genpd.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(!required_opp_tables[0]->is_genpd)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "required-opps don't belong to a genpd\n");
> + return -ENOENT;
> + }
> +

If you add this checking statement, I think that
when using dev_pm_opp_set_rate with required-opp property, it will be failed.

> /* required-opps not fully initialized yet */
> if (lazy_linking_pending(opp_table))
> return -EBUSY;
>
> Applied. Thanks.
>


--
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics