Re: [PATCH v2] recordmcount: Correct st_shndx handling

[Steven Rostedt]

On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 14:47:20 +0800
Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> One should only use st_shndx when >SHN_UNDEF and <SHN_LORESERVE. When
> SHN_XINDEX, then use .symtab_shndx. Otherwise use 0.
> 
> This handles the case: st_shndx >= SHN_LORESERVE && st_shndx != SHN_XINDEX.
> 
> Reported-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Please explain the two signed-off-by's above. If you are just tweaking
Peter's original patch, please add at the start:

From: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

And then just above your signed off by, add what you changed:

Tested-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Changed something ]
Signed-off-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

But state what you changed.

Thanks!

-- Steve