Re: [net-next: PATCH 1/3] net: mvmdio: add ACPI support

From: Marcin Wojtas
Date: Tue Jun 15 2021 - 11:09:28 EST


Hi,

niedz., 13 cze 2021 o 22:08 Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> napisał(a):
>
>
>
> On Sunday, June 13, 2021, Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > @@ -336,7 +338,7 @@ static int orion_mdio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> > dev_warn(&pdev->dev,
>> > "unsupported number of clocks, limiting to the first "
>> > __stringify(ARRAY_SIZE(dev->clk)) "\n");
>> > - } else {
>> > + } else if (!has_acpi_companion(&pdev->dev)) {
>> > dev->clk[0] = clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
>> > if (PTR_ERR(dev->clk[0]) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
>> > ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
>>
>> Is this needed? As you said, there are no clocks when ACPI is used, So
>> doesn't clk_get() return -ENODEV? Since this is not EPRODE_DEFER, it
>> keeps going. The clk_prepare_enable() won't be called.
>

Indeed, I'll double check if it works and will keep the if {} else {} intact.

>
>
> The better approach is to switch to devm_get_clk_optional() as I have done in several drivers, IIRC recently in mvpp2
>
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git/commit/?id=cf3399b731d36bc780803ff63e4d480a1efa33ac
>

Yes, this would be a nice improvement, however the
devm_get_clk_optional requires clock name (type char *) - mvmdio uses
raw indexes, so this helper unfortunately seems to be not applicable.

>>
>> > - ret = of_mdiobus_register(bus, pdev->dev.of_node);
>> > + if (pdev->dev.of_node)
>> > + ret = of_mdiobus_register(bus, pdev->dev.of_node);
>> > + else if (is_acpi_node(pdev->dev.fwnode))
>> > + ret = acpi_mdiobus_register(bus, pdev->dev.fwnode);
>> > + else
>> > + ret = -EINVAL;
>> > if (ret < 0) {
>> > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Cannot register MDIO bus (%d)\n", ret);
>> > goto out_mdio;
>> > @@ -383,6 +390,9 @@ static int orion_mdio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> > if (dev->err_interrupt > 0)
>> > writel(0, dev->regs + MVMDIO_ERR_INT_MASK);
>> >
>> > + if (has_acpi_companion(&pdev->dev))
>> > + return ret;
>> > +
>>
>> I think this can also be removed for the same reason.
>>
>> We should try to avoid adding has_acpi_companion() and
>> !pdev->dev.of_node whenever we can. It makes the driver code too much
>> of a maze.

Clock routines silently accept NULL pointers, so it will be safe to
drop this addition in v2.

Best regards,
Marcin