Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] powerpc: Cleanup use of 'struct ppc_inst'

[Michael Ellerman]

Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> This series is a cleanup of the use of 'struct ppc_inst'.
>
> A confusion is made between internal representation of powerpc
> instructions with 'struct ppc_inst' and in-memory code which is
> and will always be an array of 'unsigned int'.

Why don't we use u32 *, to make it even more explicit what the expected
size is?

cheers