Re: [PATCH] net: usb: fix possible use-after-free in smsc75xx_bind

[Dongliang Mu]

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 12:00 AM Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 23:37:12 +0800
> Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > The commit 46a8b29c6306 ("net: usb: fix memory leak in smsc75xx_bind")
> > fails to clean up the work scheduled in smsc75xx_reset->
> > smsc75xx_set_multicast, which leads to use-after-free if the work is
> > scheduled to start after the deallocation. In addition, this patch
> > also removes one dangling pointer - dev->data[0].
> >
> > This patch calls cancel_work_sync to cancel the schedule work and set
> > the dangling pointer to NULL.
> >
> > Fixes: 46a8b29c6306 ("net: usb: fix memory leak in smsc75xx_bind")
> > Signed-off-by: Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/usb/smsc75xx.c | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/smsc75xx.c b/drivers/net/usb/smsc75xx.c
> > index b286993da67c..f81740fcc8d5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/usb/smsc75xx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/usb/smsc75xx.c
> > @@ -1504,7 +1504,10 @@ static int smsc75xx_bind(struct usbnet *dev,
> > struct usb_interface *intf) return 0;
> >
> >  err:
> > +     cancel_work_sync(&pdata->set_multicast);
> >       kfree(pdata);
> > +     pdata = NULL;
> > +     dev->data[0] = 0;
> >       return ret;
> >  }
> >
>
> Hi, Dongliang!
>
> Just my thougth about this patch:
>
> INIT_WORK(&pdata->set_multicast, smsc75xx_deferred_multicast_write);
> does not queue anything, it just initalizes list structure and assigns
> callback function. The actual work sheduling happens in
> smsc75xx_set_multicast() which is smsc75xx_netdev_ops member.
>

Yes, you are right. However, as written in the commit message,
smsc75xx_set_multicast will be called by smsc75xx_reset [1].

If smsc75xx_set_multicast is called before any check failure occurs,
this work(set_multicast) will be queued into the global list with

schedule_work(&pdata->set_multicast); [2]

At last, if the pdata or dev->data[0] is freed before the
set_multicast really executes, it may lead to a UAF. Is this correct?

BTW, even if the above is true, I don't know if I call the API
``cancel_work_sync(&pdata->set_multicast)'' properly if the
schedule_work is not called.

[1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/net/usb/smsc75xx.c#L1322

[2] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/net/usb/smsc75xx.c#L583

> In case of any error in smsc75xx_bind() the device registration fails
> and smsc75xx_netdev_ops won't be registered, so, i guess, there is no
> chance of UAF.
>
>
> Am I missing something? :)
>
>
>
> With regards,
> Pavel Skripkin