Re: [RFC PATCH V3] zram:calculate available memory when zram is used
From: Greg KH
Date: Tue Jun 08 2021 - 05:28:07 EST
On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 08:39:14AM -0700, yongw.pur@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: wangyong <wang.yong12@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> When zram is used, available+Swap free memory is obviously bigger than we
> actually can use, because zram can compress memory by compression
> algorithm and zram compressed data will occupy memory too.
>
> So, we can count the compression ratio of zram in the kernel. The space
> will be saved by zram and other swap device are calculated as follows:
> zram[swapfree - swapfree * compress ratio] + swapdev[swapfree]
> We can evaluate the available memory of the whole system as:
> MemAvailable+zram[swapfree - swapfree * compress ratio]+swapdev[swapfree]
>
> Add an entry to the /proc/meminfo file, returns swap will save space.
> Which name is more appropriate is still under consideration.
> There are several alternative names: SwapAvailable, SwapSaved,
> SwapCompressible, Which is better?
>
> Adding new entries has little effect on user program, since parsers
> usually parse by keywords
>
> Changes from v2:
> *Add interface description document
> *Other mistakes and problems fix
>
> Changes from v1:
> *Use a new interface to return memory savings when using swap devices
> *Zram add min_compr_ratio attr
These "Changes" need to go below the --- line please.
>
> Signed-off-by: wangyong <wang.yong12@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/admin-guide/blockdev/zram.rst | 6 ++
> Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst | 4 ++
> drivers/block/zram/zcomp.h | 8 +++
> drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 19 ++++++
> drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h | 1 +
> fs/proc/meminfo.c | 1 +
> include/linux/swap.h | 11 ++++
> mm/swapfile.c | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/vmscan.c | 1 +
> 9 files changed, 146 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/blockdev/zram.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/blockdev/zram.rst
> index 700329d..3b7c4c4 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/blockdev/zram.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/blockdev/zram.rst
> @@ -283,6 +283,12 @@ a single line of text and contains the following stats separated by whitespace:
> Unit: 4K bytes
> ============== =============================================================
>
> +File /sys/block/zram<id>/min_compr_ratio
> +
> +The min_compr_ratio file represents the min_compr_ratio during zram swapping out.The calculation formula is as follows:
> +(orig_size * 100) / compr_data_size
> +
> +
sysfs files need to be documented in Documentation/ABI/ files. You can
reference them in other documentation files, but they need to be in the
ABI/ directory as well.
Also please wrap your lines at the proper length and use a ' ' after a
'.'
> 9) Deactivate
> =============
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst
> index 042c418..15d35ae 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst
> @@ -961,6 +961,7 @@ You may not have all of these fields.
> LowFree: 4432 kB
> SwapTotal: 0 kB
> SwapFree: 0 kB
> + SwapAvailable: 0 kB
> Dirty: 968 kB
> Writeback: 0 kB
> AnonPages: 861800 kB
> @@ -1032,6 +1033,9 @@ SwapTotal
> SwapFree
> Memory which has been evicted from RAM, and is temporarily
> on the disk
> +SwapAvailable
> + The memory savings when use swap devices. it takes zram
> + compression ratio into considerations, when zram is used
Trailing whitespace?
Did you run your patch through scripts/checkpatch.pl first before
sending it out?
> Dirty
> Memory which is waiting to get written back to the disk
> Writeback
> diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zcomp.h b/drivers/block/zram/zcomp.h
> index 40f6420..9c9cb96 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/zram/zcomp.h
> +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zcomp.h
> @@ -40,4 +40,12 @@ int zcomp_decompress(struct zcomp_strm *zstrm,
> const void *src, unsigned int src_len, void *dst);
>
> bool zcomp_set_max_streams(struct zcomp *comp, int num_strm);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ZRAM
> +int get_zram_major(void);
> +#else
> +int get_zram_major(void)
> +{
> + return -1;
> +}
> +#endif
> #endif /* _ZCOMP_H_ */
> diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> index fcaf275..8f527e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> @@ -59,6 +59,10 @@ static void zram_free_page(struct zram *zram, size_t index);
> static int zram_bvec_read(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec,
> u32 index, int offset, struct bio *bio);
>
> +int get_zram_major(void)
> +{
> + return zram_major;
Why does anyone need the zram major number?
> +}
>
> static int zram_slot_trylock(struct zram *zram, u32 index)
> {
> @@ -1040,6 +1044,19 @@ static ssize_t compact_store(struct device *dev,
> return len;
> }
>
> +static ssize_t min_compr_ratio_show(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> + struct zram *zram = dev_to_zram(dev);
> + ssize_t ret;
> +
> + down_read(&zram->init_lock);
> + ret = scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n", atomic_read(&zram->stats.min_compr_ratio));
> + up_read(&zram->init_lock);
You are using an atomic variable _AND_ a read lock? Are you sure that
makes sense?
And please use sysfs_emit() for sysfs files.
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static ssize_t io_stat_show(struct device *dev,
> struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> {
> @@ -1132,6 +1149,7 @@ static ssize_t debug_stat_show(struct device *dev,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(min_compr_ratio);
> static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(io_stat);
> static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(mm_stat);
> #ifdef CONFIG_ZRAM_WRITEBACK
> @@ -1859,6 +1877,7 @@ static struct attribute *zram_disk_attrs[] = {
> &dev_attr_idle.attr,
> &dev_attr_max_comp_streams.attr,
> &dev_attr_comp_algorithm.attr,
> + &dev_attr_min_compr_ratio.attr,
> #ifdef CONFIG_ZRAM_WRITEBACK
> &dev_attr_backing_dev.attr,
> &dev_attr_writeback.attr,
> diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
> index 80c3b43..5717e06 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
> @@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ struct zram_stats {
> atomic64_t bd_reads; /* no. of reads from backing device */
> atomic64_t bd_writes; /* no. of writes from backing device */
> #endif
> + atomic_t min_compr_ratio;
> };
>
> struct zram {
> diff --git a/fs/proc/meminfo.c b/fs/proc/meminfo.c
> index 6fa761c..34a174b 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/meminfo.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/meminfo.c
> @@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ static int meminfo_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>
> show_val_kb(m, "SwapTotal: ", i.totalswap);
> show_val_kb(m, "SwapFree: ", i.freeswap);
> + show_val_kb(m, "SwapAvailable: ", count_avail_swaps());
> show_val_kb(m, "Dirty: ",
> global_node_page_state(NR_FILE_DIRTY));
> show_val_kb(m, "Writeback: ",
> diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
> index bb48893..deed141 100644
> --- a/include/linux/swap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/swap.h
> @@ -515,6 +515,8 @@ extern int init_swap_address_space(unsigned int type, unsigned long nr_pages);
> extern void exit_swap_address_space(unsigned int type);
> extern struct swap_info_struct *get_swap_device(swp_entry_t entry);
> sector_t swap_page_sector(struct page *page);
> +extern void update_zram_zstats(void);
> +extern u64 count_avail_swaps(void);
>
> static inline void put_swap_device(struct swap_info_struct *si)
> {
> @@ -689,6 +691,15 @@ static inline swp_entry_t get_swap_page(struct page *page)
> return entry;
> }
>
> +void update_zram_zstats(void)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +u64 count_avail_swaps(void)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> #endif /* CONFIG_SWAP */
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_THP_SWAP
> diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
> index 1e07d1c..5ce5100 100644
> --- a/mm/swapfile.c
> +++ b/mm/swapfile.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
> #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
> #include <linux/swapops.h>
> #include <linux/swap_cgroup.h>
> +#include "../drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h"
That's a big hint that this is not correct, please do not do this :(
The core kernel should not depend on a random block driver's code.
thanks,
greg k-h