Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/oom_kill: allow oom kill allocating task for non-global case

From: Waiman Long
Date: Mon Jun 07 2021 - 16:07:20 EST


On 6/7/21 3:04 PM, Shakeel Butt wrote:
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 11:51 AM Waiman Long <llong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 6/7/21 2:43 PM, Shakeel Butt wrote:
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 9:45 AM Waiman Long <llong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 6/7/21 12:31 PM, Aaron Tomlin wrote:
At the present time, in the context of memcg OOM, even when
sysctl_oom_kill_allocating_task is enabled/or set, the "allocating"
task cannot be selected, as a target for the OOM killer.

This patch removes the restriction entirely.

Signed-off-by: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/oom_kill.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index eefd3f5fde46..3bae33e2d9c2 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -1089,9 +1089,9 @@ bool out_of_memory(struct oom_control *oc)
oc->nodemask = NULL;
check_panic_on_oom(oc);

- if (!is_memcg_oom(oc) && sysctl_oom_kill_allocating_task &&
- current->mm && !oom_unkillable_task(current) &&
- oom_cpuset_eligible(current, oc) &&
+ if (sysctl_oom_kill_allocating_task && current->mm &&
+ !oom_unkillable_task(current) &&
+ oom_cpuset_eligible(current, oc) &&
current->signal->oom_score_adj != OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN) {
get_task_struct(current);
oc->chosen = current;
To provide more context for this patch, we are actually seeing that in a
customer report about OOM happened in a container where the dominating
task used up most of the memory and it happened to be the task that
triggered the OOM with the result that no killable process could be
found.
Why was there no killable process? What about the process allocating
the memory or is this remote memcg charging?
It is because the other processes have a oom_adjust_score of -1000. So
they are non-killable. Anyway, they don't consume that much memory and
killing them won't free up that much.

The other process that uses most of the memory is the one that trigger
the OOM kill in the first place because the memory limit has been
reached in new memory allocation. Based on the current logic, this
process cannot be killed at all even if we set the
oom_kill_allocating_task to 1 if the OOM happens only within the memcg
context, not in a global OOM situation.
I am not really against the patch but I am still not able to
understand why select_bad_process() was not able to select the current
process. mem_cgroup_scan_tasks() traverses all the processes in the
target memcg hierarchy, so why the current was skipped.

Yes, you are right. Probably there is some problem with reaping so that the MMF_OOM_SKIP bit gets set. I don't have the answer yet.

Regards,
Longman