Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] pwm: core: Always require PWM flags to be provided

[Uwe Kleine-König]

Hello Andy,

On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 10:49:42PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> It makes little sense to make PWM flags optional since in case
> of multi-channel consumer the flags can be optional only for
> the last listed channel.

I think the same holds true for dt references.

> Thus always require PWM flags to be provided.

I'm not sure I want to follow that conclusion. Most consumers only need
a single PWM and then not providing flags is fine, isn't it? Or does
this change fix an error?

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature