Re: [PATCH v7 4/4] fpga: versal-fpga: Add versal fpga manager driver

From: Greg KH
Date: Fri Jun 04 2021 - 07:49:10 EST


On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 05:03:32PM +0530, Nava kishore Manne wrote:
> Add support for Xilinx Versal FPGA manager.
>
> PDI source type can be DDR, OCM, QSPI flash etc..
> But driver allocates memory always from DDR, Since driver supports only
> DDR source type.
>
> Signed-off-by: Appana Durga Kedareswara rao <appana.durga.rao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Nava kishore Manne <nava.manne@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Moritz Fischer <mdf@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes for v2:
> -Updated the Fpga Mgr registrations call's
> to 5.11
> -Fixed some minor coding issues as suggested by
> Moritz.
>
> Changes for v3:
> -Rewritten the Versal fpga Kconfig contents.
>
> Changes for v4:
> -Rebased the changes on linux-next.
> No functional changes.
>
> Changes for v5:
> -None.
>
> Changes for v6:
> -None.
>
> Changes for v7:
> -Updated driver to remove unwated priv struct dependency.
>
> drivers/fpga/Kconfig | 9 ++++
> drivers/fpga/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/fpga/versal-fpga.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 106 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/fpga/versal-fpga.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/Kconfig b/drivers/fpga/Kconfig
> index 33e15058d0dc..92c20b92357a 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/Kconfig
> @@ -234,4 +234,13 @@ config FPGA_MGR_ZYNQMP_FPGA
> to configure the programmable logic(PL) through PS
> on ZynqMP SoC.
>
> +config FPGA_MGR_VERSAL_FPGA
> + tristate "Xilinx Versal FPGA"
> + depends on ARCH_ZYNQMP || COMPILE_TEST
> + help
> + Select this option to enable FPGA manager driver support for
> + Xilinx Versal SoC. This driver uses the firmware interface to
> + configure the programmable logic(PL).
> +
> + To compile this as a module, choose M here.
> endif # FPGA
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/Makefile b/drivers/fpga/Makefile
> index 18dc9885883a..0bff783d1b61 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/Makefile
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_MGR_TS73XX) += ts73xx-fpga.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_MGR_XILINX_SPI) += xilinx-spi.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_MGR_ZYNQ_FPGA) += zynq-fpga.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_MGR_ZYNQMP_FPGA) += zynqmp-fpga.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_MGR_VERSAL_FPGA) += versal-fpga.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ALTERA_PR_IP_CORE) += altera-pr-ip-core.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ALTERA_PR_IP_CORE_PLAT) += altera-pr-ip-core-plat.o
>
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/versal-fpga.c b/drivers/fpga/versal-fpga.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..1bd312a31b23
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/versal-fpga.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2019-2021 Xilinx, Inc.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> +#include <linux/fpga/fpga-mgr.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/string.h>
> +#include <linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h>
> +
> +static int versal_fpga_ops_write_init(struct fpga_manager *mgr,
> + struct fpga_image_info *info,
> + const char *buf, size_t size)
> +{
> + return 0;

Why have this if it does nothing?

> +}
> +
> +static int versal_fpga_ops_write(struct fpga_manager *mgr,
> + const char *buf, size_t size)
> +{
> + dma_addr_t dma_addr = 0;
> + char *kbuf;
> + int ret;
> +
> + kbuf = dma_alloc_coherent(mgr->dev.parent, size, &dma_addr, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!kbuf)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + memcpy(kbuf, buf, size);
> + ret = zynqmp_pm_load_pdi(PDI_SRC_DDR, dma_addr);
> + dma_free_coherent(mgr->dev.parent, size, kbuf, dma_addr);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int versal_fpga_ops_write_complete(struct fpga_manager *mgr,
> + struct fpga_image_info *info)
> +{
> + return 0;

Same here, why have this at all?

> +}
> +
> +static enum fpga_mgr_states versal_fpga_ops_state(struct fpga_manager *mgr)
> +{
> + return FPGA_MGR_STATE_UNKNOWN;

Shouln't that be the default state of the fpga manager if there is no
state function callback?

This driver should just need a write and probe function, and that's it,
why make it more complex?

thanks,

greg k-h