Re: [PATCH 04/11] drm/ingenic: Move no_vblank to private state

From: Daniel Vetter
Date: Tue Jun 01 2021 - 11:48:31 EST


On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 12:20:58AM +0100, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> This information is carried from the ".atomic_check" to the
> ".atomic_commit_tail"; as such it is state-specific, and should be moved
> to the private state structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Not sure this applies to your hw, but drm_crtc_state.no_vblank exists.
Might want to move to that instead of rolling your own. Or explain why you
need your own here in your own private state. It does look quite a bit
like you're just rolling your own version of this support that helpers
gained meanwhile.
-Daniel


> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm-drv.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm-drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm-drv.c
> index e81084eb3b0e..639994329c60 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm-drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm-drv.c
> @@ -66,6 +66,8 @@ struct jz_soc_info {
>
> struct ingenic_drm_private_state {
> struct drm_private_state base;
> +
> + bool no_vblank;
> };
>
> struct ingenic_drm {
> @@ -87,7 +89,6 @@ struct ingenic_drm {
> dma_addr_t dma_hwdescs_phys;
>
> bool panel_is_sharp;
> - bool no_vblank;
>
> /*
> * clk_mutex is used to synchronize the pixel clock rate update with
> @@ -113,6 +114,30 @@ to_ingenic_drm_priv_state(struct drm_private_state *state)
> return container_of(state, struct ingenic_drm_private_state, base);
> }
>
> +static struct ingenic_drm_private_state *
> +ingenic_drm_get_priv_state(struct ingenic_drm *priv, struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> +{
> + struct drm_private_state *priv_state;
> +
> + priv_state = drm_atomic_get_private_obj_state(state, &priv->private_obj);
> + if (IS_ERR(priv_state))
> + return ERR_CAST(priv_state);
> +
> + return to_ingenic_drm_priv_state(priv_state);
> +}
> +
> +static struct ingenic_drm_private_state *
> +ingenic_drm_get_new_priv_state(struct ingenic_drm *priv, struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> +{
> + struct drm_private_state *priv_state;
> +
> + priv_state = drm_atomic_get_new_private_obj_state(state, &priv->private_obj);
> + if (!priv_state)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + return to_ingenic_drm_priv_state(priv_state);
> +}
> +
> static bool ingenic_drm_writeable_reg(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
> {
> switch (reg) {
> @@ -268,6 +293,7 @@ static int ingenic_drm_crtc_atomic_check(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> crtc);
> struct ingenic_drm *priv = drm_crtc_get_priv(crtc);
> struct drm_plane_state *f1_state, *f0_state, *ipu_state = NULL;
> + struct ingenic_drm_private_state *priv_state;
>
> if (crtc_state->gamma_lut &&
> drm_color_lut_size(crtc_state->gamma_lut) != ARRAY_SIZE(priv->dma_hwdescs->palette)) {
> @@ -299,9 +325,13 @@ static int ingenic_drm_crtc_atomic_check(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> }
> }
>
> + priv_state = ingenic_drm_get_priv_state(priv, state);
> + if (IS_ERR(priv_state))
> + return PTR_ERR(priv_state);
> +
> /* If all the planes are disabled, we won't get a VBLANK IRQ */
> - priv->no_vblank = !f1_state->fb && !f0_state->fb &&
> - !(ipu_state && ipu_state->fb);
> + priv_state->no_vblank = !f1_state->fb && !f0_state->fb &&
> + !(ipu_state && ipu_state->fb);
> }
>
> return 0;
> @@ -727,6 +757,7 @@ static void ingenic_drm_atomic_helper_commit_tail(struct drm_atomic_state *old_s
> */
> struct drm_device *dev = old_state->dev;
> struct ingenic_drm *priv = drm_device_get_priv(dev);
> + struct ingenic_drm_private_state *priv_state;
>
> drm_atomic_helper_commit_modeset_disables(dev, old_state);
>
> @@ -736,7 +767,9 @@ static void ingenic_drm_atomic_helper_commit_tail(struct drm_atomic_state *old_s
>
> drm_atomic_helper_commit_hw_done(old_state);
>
> - if (!priv->no_vblank)
> + priv_state = ingenic_drm_get_new_priv_state(priv, old_state);
> +
> + if (!priv_state || !priv_state->no_vblank)
> drm_atomic_helper_wait_for_vblanks(dev, old_state);
>
> drm_atomic_helper_cleanup_planes(dev, old_state);
> --
> 2.30.2
>

--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch