Re: [PATCH] watchdog: Reliable handling of timestamps

From: Sergey Senozhatsky
Date: Thu May 20 2021 - 01:29:39 EST


On (21/05/19 13:43), Petr Mladek wrote:
>
> The commit 9bf3bc949f8aeefeacea4b ("watchdog: cleanup handling of false
> positives") tried to handle a virtual host stopped by the host a more
> straightforward and cleaner way.
>
> But it introduced a risk of false softlockup reports. The virtual host
> might be stopped at any time, for example between
> kvm_check_and_clear_guest_paused() and is_softlockup().
> As a result, is_softlockup() might read the updated jiffies
> are detects softlockup.
>
> A solution might be to put back kvm_check_and_clear_guest_paused()
> after is_softlockup() and detect it. But it would put back
> the cycle that complicates the logic.
>
> In fact, the handling of all the timestamps is not reliable.
> The code does not guarantee when and how many times the timestamps
> are read. For example, "period_ts" might be touched anytime also
> from NMI and re-read in is_softlockup(). It works just by chance.
>
> Fix all the problems by making the code even more explicit.
>
> 1. Make sure that "now" and "period_ts" timestamps are read only
> once. They might be changed at anytime by NMI or when the virtual
> guest is stopped by the host. Note that "now" timestamp does
> this implicitly because "jiffies" is marked volatile.
>
> 2. "now" time must be read first. The state of "period_ts" will decide
> whether it will be used or the period will get restarted.
>
> 3. kvm_check_and_clear_guest_paused() must be called before reading
> "period_ts". It touches the variable when the guest was
> stopped.
>
> As a result, "now" timestamp is used only when the watchdog was
> not touched and the guest not stopped in the meantime. "period_ts"
> is restarted in all other situations.
>
> Fixes: 9bf3bc949f8aeefeacea4b ("watchdog: cleanup handling of false positives")
> Reported-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx>