Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] perf test: Handle metric reuse in pmu-events parsing test

From: John Garry
Date: Tue Apr 06 2021 - 07:03:03 EST


On 01/04/2021 14:49, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 06:33:14PM +0800, John Garry wrote:

SNIP

+struct metric {
+ struct list_head list;
+ struct metric_ref metric_ref;
+};
+
+static int resolve_metric_simple(struct expr_parse_ctx *pctx,
+ struct list_head *compound_list,
+ struct pmu_events_map *map,
+ const char *metric_name)
+{
+ struct hashmap_entry *cur, *cur_tmp;
+ struct metric *metric, *tmp;
+ size_t bkt;
+ bool all;
+ int rc;
+
+ do {
+ all = true;
+ hashmap__for_each_entry_safe((&pctx->ids), cur, cur_tmp, bkt) {
+ struct metric_ref *ref;
+ struct pmu_event *pe;
+
+ pe = metrcgroup_find_metric(cur->key, map);

*

+ if (!pe)
+ continue;
+
+ if (!strcmp(metric_name, (char *)cur->key)) {
+ pr_warning("Recursion detected for metric %s\n", metric_name);
+ rc = -1;
+ goto out_err;
+ }
+
+ all = false;
+
+ /* The metric key itself needs to go out.. */
+ expr__del_id(pctx, cur->key);
+
+ metric = malloc(sizeof(*metric));
+ if (!metric) {
+ rc = -ENOMEM;
+ goto out_err;
+ }
+
+ ref = &metric->metric_ref;
+ ref->metric_name = pe->metric_name;
+ ref->metric_expr = pe->metric_expr;
+ list_add_tail(&metric->list, compound_list);
+
+ rc = expr__find_other(pe->metric_expr, NULL, pctx, 0);


Hi Jirka,

so this might add new items to pctx->ids, I think you need
to restart the iteration as we do it in __resolve_metric
otherwise you could miss some new keys

I thought that I was doing this. Indeed, this code is very much like __resolve_metric() ;)

So expr__find_other() may add a new item to pctx->ids, and we always iterate again, and try to lookup any pmu_events, *, above. If none exist, then we have broken down pctx into primitive events aliases and unresolvable metrics, and stop iterating. And then unresolvable metrics would be found in check_parse_cpu().

As an example, we can deal with metric test1, below, which references 2x other metrics:

{
"MetricExpr": "IDQ_UOPS_NOT_DELIVERED.CORE / (4 * (( ( CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.THREAD / 2 ) * ( 1 + CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.ONE_THREAD_ACTIVE / CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.REF_XCLK ) )))",
"MetricName": "Frontend_Bound",
},
{
"MetricExpr": "( UOPS_ISSUED.ANY - UOPS_RETIRED.RETIRE_SLOTS + 4 * INT_MISC.RECOVERY_CYCLES ) / (4 * cycles)",
"MetricName": "Bad_Speculation",
},
{
"MetricExpr": "Bad_Speculation + Frontend_Bound",
"MetricName": "test1",
},

Does that satisfy your concern, or have I missed something?

Thanks,
John


jirka

+ if (rc)
+ goto out_err;
+ }
+ } while (!all);
+
+ return 0;
+
+out_err:
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(metric, tmp, compound_list, list)
+ free(metric);
+
+ return rc;
+
+}

SNIP

.