Re: [PATCH 00/18] Rid W=1 warnings from GFS2

[Lee Jones]

On Fri, 26 Mar 2021, Lee Jones wrote:

> This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1
> kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with
> niggly little warnings.
> 
> Lee Jones (18):
>   fs: gfs2: dir: Finish off mostly complete headers demote others
>   fs: gfs2: xattr: Help out some kernel-doc header demote non-conformant
>     ones
>   fs: gfs2: bmap: Demote half-complete kernel-doc headers fix others
>   fs: gfs2: glops: Fix a couple of kernel-doc misdemeanours demote
>     others
>   fs: gfs2: log: Fix a couple of param descriptions and demote
>     non-conformant headers
>   fs: gfs2: lops: Help out worthy kernel-doc headers and demote others
>   fs: gfs2: glock: Fix some deficient kernel-doc headers and demote
>     non-conformant ones
>   fs: gfs2: aops: Fix a little potential doc-rot
>   fs: gfs2: meta_io: Add missing description for 'rahead' param
>   fs: gfs2: inode: Fix worthy function headers demote others
>   fs: gfs2: file: Strip out superflouous param description and demote
>     kernel-doc abuse
>   fs: gfs2: ops_fstype: Fix a little doc-rot
>   fs: gfs2: quota: Fix incorrect param name in 'gfs2_quotad'
>   fs: gfs2: rgrp: Fix a few kernel-doc misdemeanours
>   fs: gfs2: recovery: Provide missing param descriptions and remove one
>     other
>   fs: gfs2: super: Fix kernel-doc issues where feasible demote one other
>   fs: gfs2: util: Fix one conformant kernel-doc header and demote a
>     bunch of abuses
>   fs: gfs2: lock_dlm: Demote incomplete kernel-doc header

These have been on the list for a couple of weeks now.
  
Is there anything I can do to help expedite their merge?
  
I'm concerned since -rc6 has just been released.

--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog