Re: [PATCH -next 1/3] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Fix one comment mistake

[Anshuman Khandual]

On 4/1/21 7:53 AM, Shixin Liu wrote:
> The branch condition should be CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE instead of
> CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PTE_DEVMAP.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shixin Liu <liushixin2@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
> index 05efe98a9ac2..a5c71a94e804 100644
> --- a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
> +++ b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
> @@ -755,12 +755,12 @@ static void __init pmd_swap_soft_dirty_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
>  	WARN_ON(!pmd_swp_soft_dirty(pmd_swp_mksoft_dirty(pmd)));
>  	WARN_ON(pmd_swp_soft_dirty(pmd_swp_clear_soft_dirty(pmd)));
>  }
> -#else  /* !CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PTE_DEVMAP */
> +#else  /* !CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
>  static void __init pmd_soft_dirty_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) { }
>  static void __init pmd_swap_soft_dirty_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
>  {
>  }
> -#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PTE_DEVMAP */
> +#endif /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
>  
>  static void __init pte_swap_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
>  {
> 

LGTM, thanks for catching. But does not need a patch of it's
own, instead should be folded with other potential clean ups.