Re: [PATCH 2/8] kernel: unmask SIGSTOP for IO threads

[Stefan Metzmacher]

Hi Jens,

>>> I don't assume signals wanted by userspace should potentially handled in an io_thread...
>>> e.g. things set with fcntl(fd, F_SETSIG,) used together with F_SETLEASE?
>>
>> I guess we do actually need it, if we're not fiddling with
>> wants_signal() for them. To quell Oleg's concerns, we can just move it
>> to post dup_task_struct(), that should eliminate any race concerns
>> there.
> 
> If that one is racy, don' we better also want this one?
> https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/438b738c1e4827a7fdfe43087da88bbe17eedc72.1616197787.git.metze@xxxxxxxxx/T/#u
> 
> And clear tsk->pf_io_worker ?

As the workers don't clone other workers I guess it's fine to defer this to 5.13.

metze