Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: Get right data length

From: 乱石
Date: Thu Feb 25 2021 - 09:08:23 EST


Hi,
在 2021/2/25 19:19, Andy Shevchenko 写道:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 10:35:28AM +0800, Liguang Zhang wrote:
IC_DATA_CMD[11] indicates the first data byte received after the address
phase for receive transfer in Master receiver or Slave receiver mode,
this bit was set in some transfer flow. IC_DATA_CMD[7:0] contains the
data to be transmitted or received on the I2C bus, so we should use the
lower 8 bits to get the right data length.
Thanks for the report and fix!
My comments below.

Thanks for your comments. I will optimize my code follow your comments and send v2 revision.

Regards,

Liguang


Signed-off-by: Liguang Zhang <zhangliguang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-master.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-master.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-master.c
index d6425ad6e6a3..c3cf76f6c607 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-master.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-master.c
@@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ i2c_dw_read(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
regmap_read(dev->map, DW_IC_DATA_CMD, &tmp);
/* Ensure length byte is a valid value */
if (flags & I2C_M_RECV_LEN &&
- tmp <= I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX && tmp > 0) {
+ (tmp & 0xff) <= I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX && tmp > 0) {
Can we rather describe this as

#define DW_IC_DATA_CMD_DAT GENMASK(7, 0)

in *.h file and...

(tmp & DW_IC_DATA_CMD_DAT) <= I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX && tmp > 0) {
...here?

len = i2c_dw_recv_len(dev, tmp);
}
*buf++ = tmp;
--
2.19.1.6.gb485710b