Re: [PATCH 1/3] kunit: add kunit.filter_glob cmdline option to filter suites

From: Daniel Latypov
Date: Thu Feb 04 2021 - 12:43:22 EST


On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 11:13 PM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Daniel-Latypov/kunit-support-running-subsets-of-test-suites-from/20210204-074405
> base: 88bb507a74ea7d75fa49edd421eaa710a7d80598
> config: x86_64-randconfig-m001-20210202 (attached as .config)
> compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-15) 9.3.0
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> smatch warnings:
> lib/kunit/executor.c:110 kunit_run_all_tests() error: double free of 'suite_set.start'
>
> vim +110 lib/kunit/executor.c
>
> 8c0d884986ba22 Brendan Higgins 2020-08-04 96 int kunit_run_all_tests(void)
> aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire 2020-08-04 97 {
> aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire 2020-08-04 98 struct kunit_suite * const * const *suites;
> aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire 2020-08-04 99
> d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov 2021-02-03 100 struct suite_set suite_set = kunit_filter_suites();
> 45dcbb6f5ef78b Brendan Higgins 2020-08-04 101
> d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov 2021-02-03 102 kunit_print_tap_header(&suite_set);
> d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov 2021-02-03 103
> d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov 2021-02-03 104 for (suites = suite_set.start; suites < suite_set.end; suites++)
> aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire 2020-08-04 105 __kunit_test_suites_init(*suites);
> aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire 2020-08-04 106
> d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov 2021-02-03 107 if (filter_glob) { /* a copy was made of each array */
> d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov 2021-02-03 108 for (suites = suite_set.start; suites < suite_set.end; suites++)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> This will free "suite_set.start" will in the first iteration through the
> loop

Ah, the loop is supposed to contain `kfree(*suites)`.
I'll fix the patch and resend.

I'm not familiar with conventions but it feels like adding Reported-by
on the amended patch would almost imply the report suggested the need
for the ability to filter suites.
So I'll add an informal attribution in the cover letter.

Thanks!

>
> d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov 2021-02-03 109 kfree(suites);
> d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov 2021-02-03 @110 kfree(suite_set.start);
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> and then double free it.
>
> d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov 2021-02-03 111 }
> d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov 2021-02-03 112
> aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire 2020-08-04 113 return 0;
> aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire 2020-08-04 114 }
>
> ---
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@xxxxxxxxxxxx