Re: [PATCH 7/8] sched/fair: Attempt misfit active balance when migration_type != migrate_misfit

[Dietmar Eggemann]

On 03/02/2021 19:43, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> On 03/02/21 15:16, Qais Yousef wrote:
>> On 01/28/21 18:31, Valentin Schneider wrote:
>>> Giving group_misfit_task a higher group_classify() priority than
>>> group_imbalance doesn't seem like the right thing to do. Instead, make
>>> need_active_balance() return true for any migration_type when the
>>
>> s/need_active_balance()/voluntary_active_balance()/?
>>
>>> destination CPU is idle and the source CPU has a misfit task.
>>>
>>> While at it, add an sd_has_asym_cpucapacity() guard in
>>> need_active_balance().
>>
>> ditto.
>>
> 
> Myes, clearly this has been left to ferment for too long!

Wasn't the migrate_misfit condition moved from
voluntary_active_balance() into need_active_balance() by commit
("sched/fair: Reduce cases for active balance")?