Re: [PATCH] rt2x00: remove duplicate word in comment

From: wengjianfeng
Date: Wed Feb 03 2021 - 23:46:16 EST


On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 16:33:37 -0800
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 2/3/21 4:30 PM, wengjianfeng wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 07:16:17 -0800
> > Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> On 2/2/21 10:38 PM, samirweng1979 wrote:
> >>> From: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> remove duplicate word 'we' in comment
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c | 2 +-
> >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c
> >>> b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c index
> >>> c861811..7158152 100644 ---
> >>> a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c +++
> >>> b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c @@ -179,7
> >>> +179,7 @@ void rt2x00crypto_rx_insert_iv(struct sk_buff *skb,
> >>> * Make room for new data. There are 2 possibilities
> >>> * either the alignment is already present between
> >>> * the 802.11 header and payload. In that case we
> >>> - * we have to move the header less then the iv_len
> >>> + * have to move the header less then the iv_len
> >>
> >> s/then/than/
> >>
> >>> * since we can use the already available l2pad bytes
> >>> * for the iv data.
> >>> * When the alignment must be added manually we must
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Hi Randy,
> > So you means add it for byte alignment, right? if yes,just ignore
> > the patch. thanks.
>
> No, I mean that there is a typo there also: "then" should be changed
> to "than" while you are making changes.
>
> thanks.

Hi Randy£¬
Ok£¬ I¡¡will update the patch£¬thanks for your reply.