Re: [PATCH] rt2x00: remove duplicate word in comment

From: wengjianfeng
Date: Wed Feb 03 2021 - 22:09:00 EST


On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 07:16:17 -0800
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 2/2/21 10:38 PM, samirweng1979 wrote:
> > From: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > remove duplicate word 'we' in comment
> >
> > Signed-off-by: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c
> > b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c index
> > c861811..7158152 100644 ---
> > a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c +++
> > b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c @@ -179,7
> > +179,7 @@ void rt2x00crypto_rx_insert_iv(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > * Make room for new data. There are 2 possibilities
> > * either the alignment is already present between
> > * the 802.11 header and payload. In that case we
> > - * we have to move the header less then the iv_len
> > + * have to move the header less then the iv_len
>
> s/then/than/
>
> > * since we can use the already available l2pad bytes
> > * for the iv data.
> > * When the alignment must be added manually we must
> >
>
>

Hi Randy,
So you means add it for byte alignment, right? if yes,just ignore
the patch. thanks.