Re: [PATCH v3] tpm_tis: Add missing tpm_request/relinquish_locality calls

From: Jarkko Sakkinen
Date: Tue Feb 02 2021 - 19:07:59 EST

Next message: Josh Poimboeuf: "Re: [RFC PATCH 12/17] gcc-plugins: objtool: Add plugin to detect switch table on arm64"
Previous message: Jarkko Sakkinen: "Re: [PATCH v3] tpm_tis: Add missing tpm_request/relinquish_locality calls"
In reply to: Jarkko Sakkinen: "Re: [PATCH v3] tpm_tis: Add missing tpm_request/relinquish_locality calls"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 02:05:17AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 11:49:11PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 04:51:39PM +0100, Lukasz Majczak wrote:
> > > There are missing calls to tpm_request_locality before the calls to
> > > the tpm_get_timeouts() and tpm_tis_probe_irq_single() - both functions
> > > internally send commands to the tpm. As the current
> > > approach might work for tpm2, it fails for tpm1.x - in that case
> > > call to tpm_get_timeouts() or tpm_tis_probe_irq_single()
> > > without acquired locality fails and in turn causes tpm_tis_core_init()
> > > to fail, it can be observed in the log with the following warning
> > > trace:
> >
> > I said earlier about proper capitalizations of the acronyms.
> >
> > E.g. "tpm1.x" has no meaning. TPM 1.x has. There's also a few other
> > similar examples.
> >
> > >
> > > [ 4.324298] TPM returned invalid status
> > > [ 4.324806] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1 at drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c:275 tpm_tis_status+0x86/0x8f
> >
> > To make the commit message shorter you could snip from here.
> >
> > > [ 4.325888] Modules linked in:
> > > [ 4.326287] CPU: 2 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W 5.11.0-rc6-next-20210201-00003-g214461adb2e8 #43
> > > [ 4.327406] Hardware name: Google Caroline/Caroline, BIOS Google_Caroline.7820.430.0 07/20/2018
> > > [ 4.327918] RIP: 0010:tpm_tis_status+0x86/0x8f
> > > [ 4.328323] Code: 28 00 00 00 48 3b 45 f0 75 24 89 d8 48 83 c4 10 5b 5d c3 c6 05 58 d9 28 01 01 31 db 48 c7 c7 73 52 98 9c 31 c0 e8 c2 17 b0 ff <0f> 0b eb cd e8 cf 4f 55 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 48 89 e56
> > > [ 4.330592] RSP: 0000:ffff88810092f7a0 EFLAGS: 00010246
> > > [ 4.331223] RAX: 691ee151166db100 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000001
> > > [ 4.331860] RDX: 0000000000000006 RSI: ffffffff9c96d302 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
> > > [ 4.332272] RBP: ffff88810092f7b8 R08: dffffc0000000000 R09: fffffbfff39c96ce
> > > [ 4.332683] R10: fffffbfff39c96ce R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff8881053e2000
> > > [ 4.333109] R13: 0000000065000000 R14: ffff888105d71000 R15: ffff888105cd2628
> > > [ 4.333738] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88842f200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> > > [ 4.334432] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> > > [ 4.334783] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000037828001 CR4: 00000000003706e0
> > > [ 4.335196] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> > > [ 4.335886] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> > > [ 4.336793] Call Trace:
> > > [ 4.337107] tpm_tis_send_data+0x3d/0x22f
> > > [ 4.337506] tpm_tis_send_main+0x30/0xf5
> > > [ 4.337746] tpm_transmit+0xbf/0x327
> > > [ 4.338042] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x261/0x36d
> > > [ 4.338615] tpm_transmit_cmd+0x2c/0x93
> > > [ 4.339109] tpm1_getcap+0x232/0x285
> > > [ 4.339578] tpm1_get_timeouts+0x48/0x47d
> > > [ 4.339964] ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x71/0x257
> > > [ 4.340256] ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x71/0x257
> > > [ 4.340719] ? __raw_spin_lock_init+0x40/0x69
> > > [ 4.341208] tpm_tis_core_init+0x402/0x5ee
> > > [ 4.341629] tpm_tis_init+0x11d/0x1a2
> > > [ 4.341867] tpm_tis_pnp_init+0x91/0xb5
> > > [ 4.342101] ? tis_int_handler+0x15f/0x15f
> > > [ 4.342466] pnp_device_probe+0x79/0x9f
> > > [ 4.342941] really_probe+0x149/0x4a8
> > > [ 4.343412] driver_probe_device+0xd6/0x144
> > > [ 4.343968] device_driver_attach+0x42/0x5b
> > > [ 4.344382] __driver_attach+0xca/0x139
> > > [ 4.344617] ? driver_attach+0x1f/0x1f
> > > [ 4.344860] bus_for_each_dev+0x85/0xb7
> > > [ 4.345096] bus_add_driver+0x12b/0x228
> > > [ 4.345330] driver_register+0x64/0xed
> > > [ 4.345560] init_tis+0xa5/0xeb
> > > [ 4.345784] ? lock_is_held_type+0x100/0x141
> > > [ 4.346044] ? tpm_init+0x106/0x106
> > > [ 4.346259] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x41/0x7e
> > > [ 4.346542] ? tpm_init+0x106/0x106
> > > [ 4.346678] battery: ACPI: Battery Slot [BAT0] (battery present)
> > > [ 4.346754] do_one_initcall+0x1b9/0x43d
> > > [ 4.346776] ? asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20
> > > [ 4.347659] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x8e/0x12e
> > > [ 4.347937] ? lock_is_held_type+0x100/0x141
> > > [ 4.348196] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x41/0x7e
> > > [ 4.348477] do_initcall_level+0x99/0xa9
> > > [ 4.348717] ? kernel_init+0xe/0x10a
> > > [ 4.348954] do_initcalls+0x4e/0x79
> > > [ 4.349170] kernel_init_freeable+0x15a/0x1ae
> > > [ 4.349434] ? rest_init+0x1d6/0x1d6
> > > [ 4.349655] kernel_init+0xe/0x10a
> > > [ 4.349882] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
> > > [ 4.350103] irq event stamp: 700039
> > > [ 4.350318] hardirqs last enabled at (700047): [<ffffffff9b735265>] console_unlock+0x4be/0x538
> > > [ 4.350836] hardirqs last disabled at (700056): [<ffffffff9b734e84>] console_unlock+0xdd/0x538
> > > [ 4.351331] softirqs last enabled at (699522): [<ffffffff9c4004ec>] __do_softirq+0x4ec/0x539
> > > [ 4.351835] softirqs last disabled at (699517): [<ffffffff9c200f62>] asm_call_irq_on_stack+0x12/0x20
> > >
> > > Following the trace one can also notice a comment in the tpm_tis_status():
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * If this trips, the chances are the read is
> > > * returning 0xff because the locality hasn't been
> > > * acquired. Usually because tpm_try_get_ops() hasn't
> > > * been called before doing a TPM operation.
> > > */
> > > In this case we don't have to call tpm_try_get_ops()
> >
> > Do not use "we". Write in imperative term.
> >
> > > as both calls (tpm_get_timeouts() and tpm_tis_probe_irq_single()) are
> > > in the tpm_tis_core_init function and don't require any locking or clock
> > > enablement. Similar usage is in the probe_itpm() function also called
> > > inside tpm_tis_core_init().
> >
> > You use parentheses incosistently here. E.g. tpm_tis_core_init has them
> > in some sentences, and in some it doesn't.
> >
> > > Tested on Samsung Chromebook Pro (Caroline).
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majczak <lma@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > Hi Jarkko
> > >
> > > I have checked the linux-next with James patches, also followed Dirk
> > > suggestion applying remaining ones, although without any luck -
> > > a warning trace was still present. As Guneter mentioned earlier, this
> > > patch[1] doesn't address a lack of acquired locality in the
> > > tpm_get_timeouts() and does it only for tpm_tis_probe_irq_single() but
> > > also without a call to tpm_relinquish_locality().
> > >
> > > Here are my logs from the clean linux-next master branch [2]
> > > (with two James' patches present) and with my
> > > patch applied[3]
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Lukasz
> >
> > Ok. Please also take care fixing the cosmetic things, which you
> > clearly haven't done (like writing acronyms correctly).
> >
> > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20201001180925.13808-5-James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > > [2] https://gist.github.com/semihalf-majczak-lukasz/f588c0684a6cc7d983bb9c4eb4bda586
> > > [3] https://gist.github.com/semihalf-majczak-lukasz/88ede933bc7d28d806e3532850a04054
> > >
> > > v2 -> v3:
> > > - Added braces around if part of if/else statements
> > > - Rebased to linux-next
> > > - Updated commit message
> > >
> > > drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c | 4 ++--
> > > drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c | 13 ++++++++++---
> > > drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h | 2 ++
> > > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> > > 4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> > > index ddaeceb7e109..5351963a4b19 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> > > @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ struct class *tpm_class;
> > > struct class *tpmrm_class;
> > > dev_t tpm_devt;
> > >
> > > -static int tpm_request_locality(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> > > +int tpm_request_locality(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> > > {
> > > int rc;
> > >
> > > @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static int tpm_request_locality(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static void tpm_relinquish_locality(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> > > +void tpm_relinquish_locality(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> > > {
> > > int rc;
> >
> > You need to export the symbols.
> >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
> > > index 1621ce818705..2a9001d329f2 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
> > > @@ -241,10 +241,17 @@ int tpm_get_timeouts(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> > > if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_HAVE_TIMEOUTS)
> > > return 0;
> > >
> > > - if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)
> > > + if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) {
> > > return tpm2_get_timeouts(chip);
> > > - else
> > > - return tpm1_get_timeouts(chip);
> > > + } else {
> > > + ssize_t ret = tpm_request_locality(chip);
> > > +
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > + ret = tpm1_get_timeouts(chip);
> > > + tpm_relinquish_locality(chip);
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > }
> > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_get_timeouts);
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
> > > index 947d1db0a5cc..8c13008437dd 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
> > > @@ -193,6 +193,8 @@ static inline void tpm_msleep(unsigned int delay_msec)
> > >
> > > int tpm_chip_start(struct tpm_chip *chip);
> > > void tpm_chip_stop(struct tpm_chip *chip);
> > > +int tpm_request_locality(struct tpm_chip *chip);
> > > +void tpm_relinquish_locality(struct tpm_chip *chip);
> > > struct tpm_chip *tpm_find_get_ops(struct tpm_chip *chip);
> > > __must_check int tpm_try_get_ops(struct tpm_chip *chip);
> > > void tpm_put_ops(struct tpm_chip *chip);
> > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> > > index 431919d5f48a..d4f381d6356e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> > > @@ -708,11 +708,19 @@ static int tpm_tis_gen_interrupt(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> > > u32 cap2;
> > > cap_t cap;
> > >
> > > - if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)
> > > + if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) {
> > > return tpm2_get_tpm_pt(chip, 0x100, &cap2, desc);
> > > - else
> > > - return tpm1_getcap(chip, TPM_CAP_PROP_TIS_TIMEOUT, &cap, desc,
> > > + } else {
> > > + ssize_t ret = tpm_request_locality(chip);
> > > +
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > + ret = tpm1_getcap(chip, TPM_CAP_PROP_TIS_TIMEOUT, &cap, desc,
> > > 0);
> > > + tpm_relinquish_locality(chip);
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> >
> > Why this and nost just call tpm_chip_start()?
>
> I.e. see tpm2_probe().
>
> Also, add these in place:
>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fixes: a3fbfae82b4c ("tpm: take TPM chip power gating out of tpm_transmit()")
>
> Also a minor rant (appericiate the fix a lot in all cases): please hold on
> until there's some window to see your patch. I did not understand the
> reason for all these different versions.
>
> Also remember the fix the minor glitches in the commit message that I
> pointed out.
>
> And again, thanks for fixing the issue.

I'll hold on up until I get a new version version before sending my PR
together with two of James' earlier fixes.

/Jarkko

Next message: Josh Poimboeuf: "Re: [RFC PATCH 12/17] gcc-plugins: objtool: Add plugin to detect switch table on arm64"
Previous message: Jarkko Sakkinen: "Re: [PATCH v3] tpm_tis: Add missing tpm_request/relinquish_locality calls"
In reply to: Jarkko Sakkinen: "Re: [PATCH v3] tpm_tis: Add missing tpm_request/relinquish_locality calls"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]