Re: [RESENT PATCH] arm64: cpuinfo: Add "model name" in /proc/cpuinfo for 64bit tasks also

From: Robin Murphy
Date: Tue Feb 02 2021 - 08:10:17 EST


On 2021-02-01 23:58, Tianling Shen wrote:
From: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@xxxxxxxxxx>

Removed restriction of displaying model name for 32 bit tasks only.
This can be used for 64 bit tasks as well, and it's useful for some
tools that already parse this, such as coreutils `uname -p`, Ubuntu
model name display etc.

How exactly is it useful? It clearly isn't necessary for compatibility, since AArch64 userspace has apparently been running quite happily for 8 years without it. It also doesn't convey anything meaningful to the user, since they already know they're on an Armv8-compatible processor by the fact that they're running AArch64 userspace at all.

Robin.

It should be like this:
```
$ cat '/proc/cpuinfo' | grep 'model name' | head -n 1
model name : ARMv8 Processor rev X (v8l)
```

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1472461345-28219-1-git-send-email-sumitg@xxxxxxxxxx/

Signed-off-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Tianling Shen <cnsztl@xxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
index 77605aec25fe..d69b4e486098 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
@@ -148,8 +148,7 @@ static int c_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
* "processor". Give glibc what it expects.
*/
seq_printf(m, "processor\t: %d\n", i);
- if (compat)
- seq_printf(m, "model name\t: ARMv8 Processor rev %d (%s)\n",
+ seq_printf(m, "model name\t: ARMv8 Processor rev %d (%s)\n",
MIDR_REVISION(midr), COMPAT_ELF_PLATFORM);
seq_printf(m, "BogoMIPS\t: %lu.%02lu\n",