Re: [PATCH V2] opp: Don't ignore clk_get() errors other than -ENOENT

[Viresh Kumar]

On 01-02-21, 22:54, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> Thanks, looks okay.
> 
> Although, I think the previous variant of coding style was a bit more appropriate, i.e. like this:
> 
> dev_err_probe(dev, "%s: Couldn't find clock: %d\n", __func__, ret);
> 
> return ERR_PTR(ret);

Okay will move to that.

-- 
viresh