Re: [PATCH v4 04/10] irqchip/sun6i-r: Add wakeup support

From: Marc Zyngier
Date: Thu Jan 14 2021 - 16:45:51 EST


On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 05:59:44 +0000,
Samuel Holland <samuel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Maintain bitmaps of wake-enabled IRQs and mux inputs, and program them
> to the hardware during the syscore phase of suspend and shutdown. Then
> restore the original set of enabled IRQs (only the NMI) during resume.
>
> This serves two purposes. First, it lets power management firmware
> running on the ARISC coprocessor know which wakeup sources Linux wants
> to have enabled. That way, it can avoid turning them off when it shuts
> down the remainder of the clock tree. Second, it preconfigures the
> coprocessor's interrupt controller, so the firmware's wakeup logic
> is as simple as waiting for an interrupt to arrive.
>
> The suspend/resume logic is not conditional on PM_SLEEP because it is
> identical to the init/shutdown logic. Wake IRQs may be enabled during
> shutdown to allow powering the board back on. As an example, see
> commit a5c5e50cce9d ("Input: gpio-keys - add shutdown callback").
>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-sun6i-r.c | 107 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 101 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun6i-r.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun6i-r.c
> index d04d067423f4..a1b58c98d6ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun6i-r.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun6i-r.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
> * set of 128 mux bits. This requires a second set of top-level registers.
> */
>
> +#include <linux/bitmap.h>
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> #include <linux/irq.h>
> #include <linux/irqchip.h>
> @@ -46,6 +47,7 @@
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/of_address.h>
> #include <linux/of_irq.h>
> +#include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
>
> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
>
> @@ -67,8 +69,17 @@
> #define SUN6I_NR_DIRECT_IRQS 16
> #define SUN6I_NR_MUX_BITS 128
>
> +struct sun6i_r_intc_variant {
> + u32 first_mux_irq;
> + u32 nr_mux_irqs;
> + u32 mux_valid[BITS_TO_U32(SUN6I_NR_MUX_BITS)];
> +};
> +
> static void __iomem *base;
> static irq_hw_number_t nmi_hwirq;
> +static DECLARE_BITMAP(wake_irq_enabled, SUN6I_NR_TOP_LEVEL_IRQS);
> +static DECLARE_BITMAP(wake_mux_enabled, SUN6I_NR_MUX_BITS);
> +static DECLARE_BITMAP(wake_mux_valid, SUN6I_NR_MUX_BITS);
>
> static void sun6i_r_intc_ack_nmi(void)
> {
> @@ -145,6 +156,21 @@ static int sun6i_r_intc_nmi_set_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *data,
> return irq_chip_set_parent_state(data, which, state);
> }
>
> +static int sun6i_r_intc_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on)
> +{
> + unsigned long offset_from_nmi = data->hwirq - nmi_hwirq;
> +
> + if (offset_from_nmi < SUN6I_NR_DIRECT_IRQS)
> + assign_bit(offset_from_nmi, wake_irq_enabled, on);
> + else if (test_bit(data->hwirq, wake_mux_valid))
> + assign_bit(data->hwirq, wake_mux_enabled, on);
> + else
> + /* Not wakeup capable. */
> + return -EPERM;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static struct irq_chip sun6i_r_intc_nmi_chip = {
> .name = "sun6i-r-intc",
> .irq_ack = sun6i_r_intc_nmi_ack,
> @@ -154,8 +180,19 @@ static struct irq_chip sun6i_r_intc_nmi_chip = {
> .irq_set_affinity = irq_chip_set_affinity_parent,
> .irq_set_type = sun6i_r_intc_nmi_set_type,
> .irq_set_irqchip_state = sun6i_r_intc_nmi_set_irqchip_state,
> - .flags = IRQCHIP_SET_TYPE_MASKED |
> - IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE,
> + .irq_set_wake = sun6i_r_intc_irq_set_wake,
> + .flags = IRQCHIP_SET_TYPE_MASKED,
> +};
> +
> +static struct irq_chip sun6i_r_intc_wakeup_chip = {
> + .name = "sun6i-r-intc",
> + .irq_mask = irq_chip_mask_parent,
> + .irq_unmask = irq_chip_unmask_parent,
> + .irq_eoi = irq_chip_eoi_parent,
> + .irq_set_affinity = irq_chip_set_affinity_parent,
> + .irq_set_type = irq_chip_set_type_parent,
> + .irq_set_wake = sun6i_r_intc_irq_set_wake,
> + .flags = IRQCHIP_SET_TYPE_MASKED,

Worth implementing irq_get/set_irqchip_state() using the _parent
helper, I guess.

Thanks,

M.

--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.