Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 0/2] ata: ahci_brcm: Fix use of BCM7216 reset controller

[Florian Fainelli]

On 1/5/21 1:22 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 12/23/20 4:05 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/16/2020 1:41 PM, Jim Quinlan wrote:
>>> v3 -- discard commit from v2; instead rely on the new function
>>>       reset_control_rearm provided in a recent commit [1] applied
>>>       to reset/next.
>>>    -- New commit to correct pcie-brcmstb.c usage of a reset controller
>>>       to use reset/rearm verses deassert/assert.
>>>
>>> v2 -- refactor rescal-reset driver to implement assert/deassert rather than
>>>       reset because the reset call only fires once per lifetime and we need
>>>       to reset after every resume from S2 or S3.
>>>    -- Split the use of "ahci" and "rescal" controllers in separate fields
>>>       to keep things simple.
>>>
>>> v1 -- original
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] Applied commit "reset: make shared pulsed reset controls re-triggerable"
>>>     found at git://git.pengutronix.de/git/pza/linux.git
>>>     branch reset/shared-retrigger
>>
>> The changes in that branch above have now landed in Linus' tree with:
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=557acb3d2cd9c82de19f944f6cc967a347735385
>>
>> It would be good if we could get both patches applied via the same tree
>> or within the same cycle to avoid having either PCIe or SATA broken on
>> these platforms.
> 
> Ping? Can someone apply those patches if you are happy with them? Thank you.

Ping? Can we review and ideally also apply these patches? Thanks
-- 
Florian