Re: [PATCH 16/21] x86/ftrace: Support objtool vmlinux.o validation in ftrace_64.S

From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Thu Jan 14 2021 - 15:43:34 EST


On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 13:40:12 -0600
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> With objtool vmlinux.o validation of return_to_handler(), now that
> objtool has visibility inside the retpoline, jumping from EMPTY state to
> a proper function state results in a stack state mismatch.
>
> return_to_handler() is actually quite normal despite the underlying
> magic. Just annotate it as a normal function.

If you say so ;-)

Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>

-- Steve

>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/ftrace_64.S | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace_64.S
> index 1bf568d901b1..7c273846c687 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace_64.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace_64.S
> @@ -334,8 +334,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(ftrace_graph_caller)
> retq
> SYM_FUNC_END(ftrace_graph_caller)
>
> -SYM_CODE_START(return_to_handler)
> - UNWIND_HINT_EMPTY
> +SYM_FUNC_START(return_to_handler)
> subq $24, %rsp
>
> /* Save the return values */
> @@ -350,5 +349,5 @@ SYM_CODE_START(return_to_handler)
> movq (%rsp), %rax
> addq $24, %rsp
> JMP_NOSPEC rdi
> -SYM_CODE_END(return_to_handler)
> +SYM_FUNC_END(return_to_handler)
> #endif