RE: [PATCH v13 07/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow stage 1 invalidation with unmanaged ASIDs

[Shameerali Kolothum Thodi]

Hi Eric,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Auger Eric [mailto:eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 14 January 2021 16:58
> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Xieyingtai <xieyingtai@xxxxxxxxxx>; alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx;
> wangxingang <wangxingang5@xxxxxxxxxx>; kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> maz@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; vivek.gautam@xxxxxxx;
> iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; qubingbing <qubingbing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> Zengtao (B) <prime.zeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxxx;
> eric.auger.pro@xxxxxxxxx; will@xxxxxxxxxx; kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> robin.murphy@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 07/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow stage 1 invalidation with
> unmanaged ASIDs
> 
> Hi Shameer, Jean-Philippe,
> 
> On 12/4/20 11:23 AM, Auger Eric wrote:
> > Hi Shameer, Jean-Philippe,
> >
> > On 12/4/20 11:20 AM, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote:
> >> Hi Jean,
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker [mailto:jean-philippe@xxxxxxxxxx]
> >>> Sent: 04 December 2020 09:54
> >>> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
> <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Cc: Auger Eric <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>; wangxingang
> >>> <wangxingang5@xxxxxxxxxx>; Xieyingtai <xieyingtai@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> >>> kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; maz@xxxxxxxxxx; joro@xxxxxxxxxx;
> will@xxxxxxxxxx;
> >>> iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> >>> vivek.gautam@xxxxxxx; alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx;
> >>> zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxxx; robin.murphy@xxxxxxx;
> >>> kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; eric.auger.pro@xxxxxxxxx; Zengtao (B)
> >>> <prime.zeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; qubingbing <qubingbing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 07/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow stage 1 invalidation
> with
> >>> unmanaged ASIDs
> >>>
> >>> Hi Shameer,
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 06:42:57PM +0000, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
> wrote:
> >>>> Hi Jean/zhangfei,
> >>>> Is it possible to have a branch with minimum required SVA/UACCE related
> >>> patches
> >>>> that are already public and can be a "stable" candidate for future respin
> of
> >>> Eric's series?
> >>>> Please share your thoughts.
> >>>
> >>> By "stable" you mean a fixed branch with the latest SVA/UACCE patches
> >>> based on mainline?
> >>
> >> Yes.
> >>
> >>  The uacce-devel branches from
> >>> https://github.com/Linaro/linux-kernel-uadk do provide this at the moment
> >>> (they track the latest sva/zip-devel branch
> >>> https://jpbrucker.net/git/linux/ which is roughly based on mainline.)
> As I plan to respin shortly, please could you confirm the best branch to
> rebase on still is that one (uacce-devel from the linux-kernel-uadk git
> repo). Is it up to date? Commits seem to be quite old there.

I think it is the uacce-devel-5.11 branch, but will wait for Jean or Zhangfei
to confirm.

Thanks,
Shameer

> Thanks
> 
> Eric
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> Hi Eric,
> >>
> >> Could you please take a look at the above branches and see whether it make
> sense
> >> to rebase on top of either of those?
> >>
> >> From vSVA point of view, it will be less rebase hassle if we can do that.
> >
> > Sure. I will rebase on top of this ;-)
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Eric
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Shameer
> >>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Jean
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > iommu mailing list
> > iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
> >