Re: [PATCH 2/2] tools/bpftool: Add -Wall when building BPF programs

From: Yonghong Song
Date: Wed Jan 13 2021 - 21:42:32 EST

Next message: kernel test robot: "arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:164:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'do_el0_svc_compat'"
Previous message: Paul Moore: "Re: [PATCH v10 8/8] selinux: include a consumer of the new IMA critical data hook"
In reply to: Ian Rogers: "[PATCH 2/2] tools/bpftool: Add -Wall when building BPF programs"
Next in thread: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] bpf, libbpf: Avoid unused function warning on bpf_tail_call_static"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 1/13/21 2:36 PM, Ian Rogers wrote:

No additional warnings are generated by enabling this, but having it
enabled will help avoid regressions.

Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx>

Next message: kernel test robot: "arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:164:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'do_el0_svc_compat'"
Previous message: Paul Moore: "Re: [PATCH v10 8/8] selinux: include a consumer of the new IMA critical data hook"
In reply to: Ian Rogers: "[PATCH 2/2] tools/bpftool: Add -Wall when building BPF programs"
Next in thread: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] bpf, libbpf: Avoid unused function warning on bpf_tail_call_static"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]