Re: [PATCH v2 29/48] soc/tegra: pmc: Link domains to the parent Core domain

From: Dmitry Osipenko
Date: Tue Jan 12 2021 - 11:23:20 EST


12.01.2021 16:30, Ulf Hansson пишет:
> - trimmed cc-list
>
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 19:07, Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> The Core domain is a parent of PMC power domains, hence PMC domains
>> should be set up as a sub-domains of the parent (Core) domain if
>> "power-domains" phandle presents in a device-tree node of PMC domain.
>>
>> This allows to propagate GENPD performance changes to the parent Core
>> domain if performance change is applied to PMC domain.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
>> index 4f96dc7745c4..1a659d1c06d7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
>> @@ -1236,6 +1236,7 @@ static int tegra_powergate_add(struct tegra_pmc *pmc, struct device_node *np)
>> static int tegra_powergate_init(struct tegra_pmc *pmc,
>> struct device_node *parent)
>> {
>> + struct of_phandle_args child_args, parent_args;
>> struct device_node *np, *child;
>> int err = 0;
>>
>> @@ -1249,6 +1250,24 @@ static int tegra_powergate_init(struct tegra_pmc *pmc,
>> of_node_put(child);
>> break;
>> }
>> +
>> + if (of_parse_phandle_with_args(child, "power-domains",
>> + "#power-domain-cells",
>> + 0, &parent_args))
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + child_args.np = child;
>> + child_args.args_count = 0;
>> +
>> + err = of_genpd_add_subdomain(&parent_args, &child_args);
>> + of_node_put(parent_args.np);
>> + if (err) {
>> + if (err == -ENOENT)
>> + err = -EPROBE_DEFER;
>
> Okay. So this special error treatment is needed because
> of_genpd_add_subdomain may return -ENOENT, in case the providers for
> the parent-domain and child-domain haven't been registered yet.
>
> I suggest we move this into of_genpd_add_subdomain() instead, thus
> letting it return -EPROBE_DEFER when there are parent/child nodes
> specified in DT, but the providers are lacking.

Alright