Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: Add support for deep CPU cluster idle

From: Bjorn Andersson
Date: Tue Jan 12 2021 - 09:23:38 EST

Next message: Michal Hocko: "Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] mm: migrate: do not migrate HugeTLB page whose refcount is one"
Previous message: Daniel Vetter: "Re: [PATCH] drm: Improve the output_poll_changed description"
In reply to: Ulf Hansson: "Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: Add support for deep CPU cluster idle"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue 12 Jan 04:09 CST 2021, Ulf Hansson wrote:

> + Lina
>
> On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 at 00:05, Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue 05 Jan 12:10 PST 2021, Danny Lin wrote:
> >
> > > This commit adds support for deep idling of the entire unified DynamIQ
> > > CPU cluster on sm8150. In this idle state, the LLCC (Last-Level Cache
> > > Controller) is powered off and the AOP (Always-On Processor) enters a
> > > low-power sleep state.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure what the per-CPU 0x400000f4 idle state previously
> > > contributed by Qualcomm as the "cluster sleep" state is, but the
> > > downstream kernel has no such state. The real deep cluster idle state
> > > is 0x41000c244, composed of:
> > >
> > > Cluster idle state: (0xc24) << 4 = 0xc240
> > > Is reset state: 1 << 30 = 0x40000000
> > > Affinity level: 1 << 24 = 0x1000000
> > > CPU idle state: 0x4 (power collapse)
> > >
> > > This setup can be replicated with the PSCI power domain cpuidle driver,
> > > which utilizes OSI to enter cluster idle when the last active CPU
> > > enters idle.
> > >
> > > The cluster idle state cannot be used as a plain cpuidle state because
> > > it requires that all CPUs in the cluster are idling.
> > >
> >
> > This looks quite reasonable to me.
> >
> > @Ulf, this seems to be the first attempt at wiring up the domain idle
> > pieces upstream, would you mind having a look?
>
> Certainly I can have a look, but I could find the original posted
> patch. I had a look at the below changes and it looks good to me. Feel
> free to add my reviewed-by tag for it.
>

Thank you.

> Also note, the db410c was the first one to support this as introduced
> in commit e37131556801 for v5.6. You may have a look at
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi.
>

For some reason I failed to find that commit while looking for your work
on the subject, thanks for pointing it out!

Regards,
Bjorn

> Kind regards
> Uffe
>
> >
> > The SM8150 pretty much identical to RB3 in this regard.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bjorn
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Danny Lin <danny@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > > 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi
> > > index 309e00b6fa44..8956c6986744 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi
> > > @@ -52,10 +52,10 @@ CPU0: cpu@0 {
> > > enable-method = "psci";
> > > capacity-dmips-mhz = <488>;
> > > dynamic-power-coefficient = <232>;
> > > - cpu-idle-states = <&LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_0
> > > - &CLUSTER_SLEEP_0>;
> > > next-level-cache = <&L2_0>;
> > > qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
> > > + power-domains = <&CPU_PD0>;
> > > + power-domain-names = "psci";
> > > #cooling-cells = <2>;
> > > L2_0: l2-cache {
> > > compatible = "cache";
> > > @@ -73,10 +73,10 @@ CPU1: cpu@100 {
> > > enable-method = "psci";
> > > capacity-dmips-mhz = <488>;
> > > dynamic-power-coefficient = <232>;
> > > - cpu-idle-states = <&LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_0
> > > - &CLUSTER_SLEEP_0>;
> > > next-level-cache = <&L2_100>;
> > > qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
> > > + power-domains = <&CPU_PD1>;
> > > + power-domain-names = "psci";
> > > #cooling-cells = <2>;
> > > L2_100: l2-cache {
> > > compatible = "cache";
> > > @@ -92,10 +92,10 @@ CPU2: cpu@200 {
> > > enable-method = "psci";
> > > capacity-dmips-mhz = <488>;
> > > dynamic-power-coefficient = <232>;
> > > - cpu-idle-states = <&LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_0
> > > - &CLUSTER_SLEEP_0>;
> > > next-level-cache = <&L2_200>;
> > > qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
> > > + power-domains = <&CPU_PD2>;
> > > + power-domain-names = "psci";
> > > #cooling-cells = <2>;
> > > L2_200: l2-cache {
> > > compatible = "cache";
> > > @@ -110,10 +110,10 @@ CPU3: cpu@300 {
> > > enable-method = "psci";
> > > capacity-dmips-mhz = <488>;
> > > dynamic-power-coefficient = <232>;
> > > - cpu-idle-states = <&LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_0
> > > - &CLUSTER_SLEEP_0>;
> > > next-level-cache = <&L2_300>;
> > > qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
> > > + power-domains = <&CPU_PD3>;
> > > + power-domain-names = "psci";
> > > #cooling-cells = <2>;
> > > L2_300: l2-cache {
> > > compatible = "cache";
> > > @@ -128,10 +128,10 @@ CPU4: cpu@400 {
> > > enable-method = "psci";
> > > capacity-dmips-mhz = <1024>;
> > > dynamic-power-coefficient = <369>;
> > > - cpu-idle-states = <&BIG_CPU_SLEEP_0
> > > - &CLUSTER_SLEEP_0>;
> > > next-level-cache = <&L2_400>;
> > > qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 1>;
> > > + power-domains = <&CPU_PD4>;
> > > + power-domain-names = "psci";
> > > #cooling-cells = <2>;
> > > L2_400: l2-cache {
> > > compatible = "cache";
> > > @@ -146,10 +146,10 @@ CPU5: cpu@500 {
> > > enable-method = "psci";
> > > capacity-dmips-mhz = <1024>;
> > > dynamic-power-coefficient = <369>;
> > > - cpu-idle-states = <&BIG_CPU_SLEEP_0
> > > - &CLUSTER_SLEEP_0>;
> > > next-level-cache = <&L2_500>;
> > > qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 1>;
> > > + power-domains = <&CPU_PD5>;
> > > + power-domain-names = "psci";
> > > #cooling-cells = <2>;
> > > L2_500: l2-cache {
> > > compatible = "cache";
> > > @@ -164,10 +164,10 @@ CPU6: cpu@600 {
> > > enable-method = "psci";
> > > capacity-dmips-mhz = <1024>;
> > > dynamic-power-coefficient = <369>;
> > > - cpu-idle-states = <&BIG_CPU_SLEEP_0
> > > - &CLUSTER_SLEEP_0>;
> > > next-level-cache = <&L2_600>;
> > > qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 1>;
> > > + power-domains = <&CPU_PD6>;
> > > + power-domain-names = "psci";
> > > #cooling-cells = <2>;
> > > L2_600: l2-cache {
> > > compatible = "cache";
> > > @@ -182,10 +182,10 @@ CPU7: cpu@700 {
> > > enable-method = "psci";
> > > capacity-dmips-mhz = <1024>;
> > > dynamic-power-coefficient = <421>;
> > > - cpu-idle-states = <&BIG_CPU_SLEEP_0
> > > - &CLUSTER_SLEEP_0>;
> > > next-level-cache = <&L2_700>;
> > > qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 2>;
> > > + power-domains = <&CPU_PD7>;
> > > + power-domain-names = "psci";
> > > #cooling-cells = <2>;
> > > L2_700: l2-cache {
> > > compatible = "cache";
> > > @@ -251,11 +251,13 @@ BIG_CPU_SLEEP_0: cpu-sleep-1-0 {
> > > min-residency-us = <4488>;
> > > local-timer-stop;
> > > };
> > > + };
> > >
> > > + domain-idle-states {
> > > CLUSTER_SLEEP_0: cluster-sleep-0 {
> > > - compatible = "arm,idle-state";
> > > + compatible = "domain-idle-state";
> > > idle-state-name = "cluster-power-collapse";
> > > - arm,psci-suspend-param = <0x400000F4>;
> > > + arm,psci-suspend-param = <0x4100c244>;
> > > entry-latency-us = <3263>;
> > > exit-latency-us = <6562>;
> > > min-residency-us = <9987>;
> > > @@ -291,6 +293,59 @@ pmu {
> > > psci {
> > > compatible = "arm,psci-1.0";
> > > method = "smc";
> > > +
> > > + CPU_PD0: cpu0 {
> > > + #power-domain-cells = <0>;
> > > + power-domains = <&CLUSTER_PD>;
> > > + domain-idle-states = <&LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_0>;
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + CPU_PD1: cpu1 {
> > > + #power-domain-cells = <0>;
> > > + power-domains = <&CLUSTER_PD>;
> > > + domain-idle-states = <&LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_0>;
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + CPU_PD2: cpu2 {
> > > + #power-domain-cells = <0>;
> > > + power-domains = <&CLUSTER_PD>;
> > > + domain-idle-states = <&LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_0>;
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + CPU_PD3: cpu3 {
> > > + #power-domain-cells = <0>;
> > > + power-domains = <&CLUSTER_PD>;
> > > + domain-idle-states = <&LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_0>;
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + CPU_PD4: cpu4 {
> > > + #power-domain-cells = <0>;
> > > + power-domains = <&CLUSTER_PD>;
> > > + domain-idle-states = <&BIG_CPU_SLEEP_0>;
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + CPU_PD5: cpu5 {
> > > + #power-domain-cells = <0>;
> > > + power-domains = <&CLUSTER_PD>;
> > > + domain-idle-states = <&BIG_CPU_SLEEP_0>;
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + CPU_PD6: cpu6 {
> > > + #power-domain-cells = <0>;
> > > + power-domains = <&CLUSTER_PD>;
> > > + domain-idle-states = <&BIG_CPU_SLEEP_0>;
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + CPU_PD7: cpu7 {
> > > + #power-domain-cells = <0>;
> > > + power-domains = <&CLUSTER_PD>;
> > > + domain-idle-states = <&BIG_CPU_SLEEP_0>;
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + CLUSTER_PD: cpu-cluster0 {
> > > + #power-domain-cells = <0>;
> > > + domain-idle-states = <&CLUSTER_SLEEP_0>;
> > > + };
> > > };
> > >
> > > reserved-memory {
> > > --
> > > 2.29.2
> > >

Next message: Michal Hocko: "Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] mm: migrate: do not migrate HugeTLB page whose refcount is one"
Previous message: Daniel Vetter: "Re: [PATCH] drm: Improve the output_poll_changed description"
In reply to: Ulf Hansson: "Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: Add support for deep CPU cluster idle"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]