Re: [PATCH] seccomp: Add missing return in non-void function

From: Kees Cook
Date: Mon Jan 11 2021 - 15:07:00 EST


On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 17:28:39 +0000, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> We don't actually care about the value, since the kernel will panic
> before that; but a value should nonetheless be returned, otherwise the
> compiler will complain.

Applied to for-linus/seccomp, thanks!

[1/1] seccomp: Add missing return in non-void function
https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/04b38d012556

--
Kees Cook