Re: [PATCH v1] i2c: tegra: Fix i2c_writesl() to use writel() instead of writesl()

[Dmitry Osipenko]

11.01.2021 14:50, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
> 20.10.2020 19:37, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>>
>> On 10/20/20 12:48 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 09:03:54PM -0700, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote:
>>>> VI I2C don't have DMA support and uses PIO mode all the time.
>>>>
>>>> Current driver uses writesl() to fill TX FIFO based on available
>>>> empty slots and with this seeing strange silent hang during any I2C
>>>> register access after filling TX FIFO with 8 words.
>>>>
>>>> Using writel() followed by i2c_readl() in a loop to write all words
>>>> to TX FIFO instead of using writesl() helps for large transfers in
>>>> PIO mode.
>>>>
>>>> So, this patch updates i2c_writesl() API to use writel() in a loop
>>>> instead of writesl().
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>>   drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c | 9 ++++++---
>>>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
>>>> b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
>>>> index 6f08c0c..274bf3a 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
>>>> @@ -333,10 +333,13 @@ static u32 i2c_readl(struct tegra_i2c_dev
>>>> *i2c_dev, unsigned int reg)
>>>>       return readl_relaxed(i2c_dev->base +
>>>> tegra_i2c_reg_addr(i2c_dev, reg));
>>>>   }
>>>>   -static void i2c_writesl(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev, void *data,
>>>> +static void i2c_writesl(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev, u32 *data,
>>>>               unsigned int reg, unsigned int len)
>>>>   {
>>>> -    writesl(i2c_dev->base + tegra_i2c_reg_addr(i2c_dev, reg), data,
>>>> len);
>>>> +    while (len--) {
>>>> +        writel(*data++, i2c_dev->base + tegra_i2c_reg_addr(i2c_dev,
>>>> reg));
>>>> +        i2c_readl(i2c_dev, I2C_INT_STATUS);
>>>> +    }
>>>>   }
>>>>     static void i2c_readsl(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev, void *data,
>>>> @@ -811,7 +814,7 @@ static int tegra_i2c_fill_tx_fifo(struct
>>>> tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
>>>>           i2c_dev->msg_buf_remaining = buf_remaining;
>>>>           i2c_dev->msg_buf = buf + words_to_transfer *
>>>> BYTES_PER_FIFO_WORD;
>>>>   -        i2c_writesl(i2c_dev, buf, I2C_TX_FIFO, words_to_transfer);
>>>> +        i2c_writesl(i2c_dev, (u32 *)buf, I2C_TX_FIFO,
>>>> words_to_transfer);
>>> I've thought a bit more about this and I wonder if we're simply reading
>>> out the wrong value for tx_fifo_avail and therefore end up overflowing
>>> the TX FIFO. Have you checked what the value is for tx_fifo_avail when
>>> this silent hang occurs? Given that this is specific to the VI I2C I'm
>>> wondering if this is perhaps a hardware bug where we read the wrong TX
>>> FIFO available count.
>>>
>>> Thierry
>>
>> Yes FIFO status shows all 8 slots available.
> 
> Please explain how you checked that 8 slots are available, provide
> example code.
> 

Have you checked the FIFO overflow interrupt?