Re: [PATCH V4 4/5] gpio: gpio-xilinx: Add support for suspend and resume

From: Linus Walleij
Date: Thu Jan 07 2021 - 04:47:45 EST


On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 1:27 PM Srinivas Neeli <srinivas.neeli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Add support for suspend and resume, pm runtime suspend and resume.
> Added free and request calls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Neeli <srinivas.neeli@xxxxxxxxxx>
(...)

> +static int xgpio_request(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(chip->parent);
> + /*
> + * If the device is already active pm_runtime_get() will return 1 on
> + * success, but gpio_request still needs to return 0.
> + */
> + return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
> +}

That's clever. I think more GPIO drivers should be doing it like this,
today I think most just ignore the return code.

> +static int __maybe_unused xgpio_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +static int __maybe_unused xgpio_resume(struct device *dev)

Those look good.


> /**
> * xgpio_remove - Remove method for the GPIO device.
> * @pdev: pointer to the platform device
> @@ -289,7 +323,10 @@ static int xgpio_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct xgpio_instance *gpio = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>
> - clk_disable_unprepare(gpio->clk);
> + if (!pm_runtime_suspended(&pdev->dev))
> + clk_disable_unprepare(gpio->clk);
> +
> + pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);

This looks complex and racy. What if the device is resumed after you
executed the
first part of the statement.

The normal sequence is:

pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev);
pm_runtime_disable(dev);

This will make sure the clock is enabled and pm runtime is disabled.
After this you can unconditionally call clk_disable_unprepare(gpio->clk);

It is what you are doing on the errorpath of probe().

Yours,
Linus Walleij