Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] scsi: ufs: handle LINERESET with correct tm_cmd

From: Can Guo
Date: Thu Jan 07 2021 - 03:03:35 EST


On 2021-01-07 15:47, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx>

This fixes a warning caused by wrong reserve tag usage in __ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd.

WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 7 at block/blk-core.c:630 blk_get_request+0x68/0x70
WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 157 at block/blk-mq-tag.c:82 blk_mq_get_tag+0x438/0x46c

And, in ufshcd_err_handler(), we can avoid to send tm_cmd before aborting
outstanding commands by waiting a bit for IO completion like this.

__ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd: task management cmd 0x80 timed-out

Fixes: 69a6c269c097 ("scsi: ufs: Use blk_{get,put}_request() to
allocate and free TMFs")
Fixes: 2355b66ed20c ("scsi: ufs: Handle LINERESET indication in err handler")

Hi Jaegeuk,

Sorry, what is wrong with commit 2355b66ed20c? Clearing pending I/O
reqs is a general procedure for handling all non-fatal errors.

Thanks,
Can Guo.

Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index e6e7bdf99cd7..340dd5e515dd 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -44,6 +44,9 @@
/* Query request timeout */
#define QUERY_REQ_TIMEOUT 1500 /* 1.5 seconds */

+/* LINERESET TIME OUT */
+#define LINERESET_IO_TIMEOUT_MS (30000) /* 30 sec */
+
/* Task management command timeout */
#define TM_CMD_TIMEOUT 100 /* msecs */

@@ -5826,6 +5829,7 @@ static void ufshcd_err_handler(struct work_struct *work)
int err = 0, pmc_err;
int tag;
bool needs_reset = false, needs_restore = false;
+ ktime_t start;

hba = container_of(work, struct ufs_hba, eh_work);

@@ -5911,6 +5915,22 @@ static void ufshcd_err_handler(struct work_struct *work)
}

hba->silence_err_logs = true;
+
+ /* Wait for IO completion for non-fatal errors to avoid aborting IOs */
+ start = ktime_get();
+ while (hba->outstanding_reqs) {
+ ufshcd_complete_requests(hba);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
+ schedule();
+ spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
+ if (ktime_to_ms(ktime_sub(ktime_get(), start)) >
+ LINERESET_IO_TIMEOUT_MS) {
+ dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: timeout, outstanding=0x%lx\n",
+ __func__, hba->outstanding_reqs);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
/* release lock as clear command might sleep */
spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
/* Clear pending transfer requests */
@@ -6302,9 +6322,13 @@ static irqreturn_t ufshcd_intr(int irq, void *__hba)
intr_status = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_INTERRUPT_STATUS);
}

- if (enabled_intr_status && retval == IRQ_NONE) {
- dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: Unhandled interrupt 0x%08x\n",
- __func__, intr_status);
+ if (enabled_intr_status && retval == IRQ_NONE &&
+ !ufshcd_eh_in_progress(hba)) {
+ dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: Unhandled interrupt 0x%08x (0x%08x, 0x%08x)\n",
+ __func__,
+ intr_status,
+ hba->ufs_stats.last_intr_status,
+ enabled_intr_status);
ufshcd_dump_regs(hba, 0, UFSHCI_REG_SPACE_SIZE, "host_regs: ");
}

@@ -6348,7 +6372,10 @@ static int __ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,
* Even though we use wait_event() which sleeps indefinitely,
* the maximum wait time is bounded by %TM_CMD_TIMEOUT.
*/
- req = blk_get_request(q, REQ_OP_DRV_OUT, BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED);
+ req = blk_get_request(q, REQ_OP_DRV_OUT, 0);
+ if (IS_ERR(req))
+ return PTR_ERR(req);
+
req->end_io_data = &wait;
free_slot = req->tag;
WARN_ON_ONCE(free_slot < 0 || free_slot >= hba->nutmrs);