Re: Linux 5.10

From: Mike Snitzer
Date: Mon Dec 14 2020 - 12:09:07 EST


On Mon, Dec 14 2020 at 11:44am -0500,
Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 11:02:47AM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 14 2020 at 12:52am -0500,
> > Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 12:31:47AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 03:03:29PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > > > Ok, here it is - 5.10 is tagged and pushed out.
> > > > >
> > > > > I pretty much always wish that the last week was even calmer than it
> > > > > was, and that's true here too. There's a fair amount of fixes in here,
> > > > > including a few last-minute reverts for things that didn't get fixed,
> > > > > but nothing makes me go "we need another week".
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > > Mike Snitzer (1):
> > > > > md: change mddev 'chunk_sectors' from int to unsigned
> > > >
> > > > Seems to be broken. This breaks mounting my raid6 partition:
> > > >
> > > > [ 87.290698] attempt to access beyond end of device
> > > > md0: rw=4096, want=13996467328, limit=6261202944
> > > > [ 87.293371] attempt to access beyond end of device
> > > > md0: rw=4096, want=13998564480, limit=6261202944
> > > > [ 87.296045] BTRFS warning (device md0): couldn't read tree root
> > > > [ 87.300056] BTRFS error (device md0): open_ctree failed
> > > >
> > > > Reverting it goes back to the -rc7 behaviour where it mounts fine.
> > >
> > > If the developer/maintainer(s) agree, I can revert this and push out a
> > > 5.10.1, just let me know.
> >
> > Yes, these should be reverted from 5.10 via 5.10.1:
> >
> > e0910c8e4f87 dm raid: fix discard limits for raid1 and raid10
> > f075cfb1dc59 md: change mddev 'chunk_sectors' from int to unsigned
> >
> > They were also both marked for stable@, and I just got email stating
> > that you've staged them both for 5.4 and 5.9, but they shouldn't go to
> > stable@. We need to reassess and fix during 5.11.
>
> Ok, will go push out a 5.10.1 with those reverted, but please, get the
> reverts into Linus as soon as possible as well.

Yes, will do, working on it now!

Thanks,
Mike