Re: [net-next v3 0/8] seg6: add support for SRv6 End.DT4/DT6 behavior

[David Ahern]

On 11/25/20 9:47 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 21:37:18 -0700 David Ahern wrote:
>> On 11/24/20 6:58 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>> But it's generally not a huge issue for applying the patch. I just like
>>> to see the build bot result, to make sure we're not adding W=1 C=1
>>> warnings.  
>>
>> ah, the build bot part is new. got it.
> 
> BTW I was wondering for the longest time how to structure things so
> that build bot can also build iproute2 in case we want to run tests
> attached to the series and the tests depend on iproute2 changes...
> 
> But let's cross that bridge when we get there.
> 

Why not cross it now? You handled the switch over to new a patchworks
with a build bot, so we can take advantage of automation.

Seems like the bot needs to detect 'net', 'net-next', 'bpf' and
'bpf-next' as they are all different trees for the kernel patches.
iproute2 is just another tree, so it should be able to put those in a
different bucket for automated builds - even if it means a 'set' crosses
trees.