Re: [net-next v3 0/8] seg6: add support for SRv6 End.DT4/DT6 behavior

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 19:28:48 +0100 Andrea Mayer wrote:
> - Patch 1 is needed to solve a pre-existing issue with tunneled packets
>   when a sniffer is attached;
> 
> - Patch 2 improves the management of the seg6local attributes used by the
>   SRv6 behaviors;
> 
> - Patch 3 adds support for optional attributes in SRv6 behaviors;
> 
> - Patch 4 introduces two callbacks used for customizing the
>   creation/destruction of a SRv6 behavior;
> 
> - Patch 5 is the core patch that adds support for the SRv6 End.DT4
>   behavior;
> 
> - Patch 6 introduces the VRF support for SRv6 End.DT6 behavior;
> 
> - Patch 7 adds the selftest for SRv6 End.DT4 behavior;
> 
> - Patch 8 adds the selftest for SRv6 End.DT6 (VRF mode) behavior;
> 
> - Patch 9 adds the vrftable attribute for End.DT4/DT6 behaviors in iproute2.

LGTM! Please address the nit and repost without the iproute2 patch.
Mixing the iproute2 patch in has confused patchwork:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=389667&state=*

Note how it thinks that the iproute2 patch is part of the kernel
series. This build bot-y thing is pretty new. I'll add a suggestion 
to our process documentation not to mix patches.

> I would like to thank David Ahern for his support during the development of
> this patchset.

Should I take this to mean that David has review the code off-list?