Re: [PATCH 052/141] security: keys: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

[Gustavo A. R. Silva]

On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 12:54:02AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 12:32:20PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
> > by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall
> > through to the next case.
> > 
> > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
> > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  security/keys/process_keys.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/security/keys/process_keys.c b/security/keys/process_keys.c
> > index 1fe8b934f656..e3d79a7b6db6 100644
> > --- a/security/keys/process_keys.c
> > +++ b/security/keys/process_keys.c
> > @@ -783,6 +783,7 @@ key_ref_t lookup_user_key(key_serial_t id, unsigned long lflags,
> >  				if (need_perm != KEY_AUTHTOKEN_OVERRIDE &&
> >  				    need_perm != KEY_DEFER_PERM_CHECK)
> >  					goto invalid_key;
> > +				break;
> >  			case 0:
> >  				break;
> >  			}
> > -- 
> > 2.27.0
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thank you, Jarkko.
--
Gustavo